- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 9,940
- Reaction score
- 10,207
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.parker would have been no better than #3 wr going into this year, so it's not really that bad
vj will be #1, floyd #2, davis #3
and you factor in gates and LT are the bigger threats anyway, and it's almost meaningless
you may as well claim we lost our best wr when we let keenan mccardell walk....hilarious
edit: in other words it's as if the pats lost welker
What is this based on? Last year Parker was the leading WR on your team.parker would have been no better than #3 wr going into this year, so it's not really that bad
vj will be #1, floyd #2, davis #3
Indeed.....hilarious
Umm, I would consider the loss of Welker to be a significant blow. Not saying we couldn't overcome it, but I wouldn't say Welker didn't mean anything, either.in other words it's as if the pats lost welker
A Charger fan is now indistinguishable from a Raider fan. Totally fixated on the Patriots, and unable to accept that a few talented players cannot beat a team that plays like a team.Less than three hours after a post on a Patriot's board, a Charger fan shows up. Isn't there anything else for these people to do?
I think us losing Welker would hurt more than the Chargers losing Parker.
I would not underestimate Welker, I think he will be a more explosive version of a 2001 Troy Brown. He will be a key guy in the slot who I think will lead the Pats in receptions in 2007.
this would be like caldwell getting injured for you guys last year, and a charger fan claiming "ne just lost their best wr on an average wr corp"I thought that was Caldwell.
if i ever said you beat us because we didn't have parker, i'd give you permission to shoot me hahaYou shouldn't be saying stuff like this. Not only it is wrong, but you won't look like such a dork next month when you say, "Sure, you beat us, but we were without our two best WRs from last year, Parker and McCardell.
What is this based on? Last year Parker was the leading WR on your team.
Indeed.
Umm, I would consider the loss of Welker to be a significant blow. Not saying we couldn't overcome it, but I wouldn't say Welker didn't mean anything, either.
No one is saying you are doomed, or that you can't win. Only that you have suffered a setback. Myself, I dislike to see injuries on teams with whiny fans, because I get tired of their excuses after they lose.
A Charger fan is now indistinguishable from a Raider fan. Totally fixated on the Patriots, and unable to accept that a few talented players cannot beat a team that plays like a team.
Whine, whine, whine. Coulda, shoulda, woulda. This will go one for a couple years, then they will fade into oblivion, and good riddance.
yes but we make up for it with gates and LT, two things the pats are not even close to havingI disagree.
I think Welker is a better player and will be much more productive, but the Patriots have plenty of WR options to overcome a welker loss.
The Chargers are weak at WR even with Parker, and maybe th eweakest WR corp in the entire NFL without him.
exactly , and so was mccree, but if mccree gets injured i'll actually call that a big blowToo bad. Parker was one of the Pats best players in the playoff game.
pro bowl is proof enough for me, and all his comeback wins, and the fact that he's not the one who choked in the playoffs, that was florence mccree and parkerWith a young and unproven QB, I'd have to think that the loss of any veteran receiver is bad news for SD.
this would be like caldwell getting injured for you guys last year, and a charger fan claiming "ne just lost their best wr on an average wr corp"
it's just laughable
sadly i know we have ******ed fans in our fanbase who would do that , just like you guys have your 'special' section
the point is, in NE you guys can lose a guy like moss, or last year caldwell, and not have great problems because you have brady who can make any wr look better than they are...this is a fact , and we can lose a guy like parker and not have great problems, we have gates and 2 to 3 wrs who were expected to start ahead of parker, not to mention LTHow is that laughable?
When you lose the best player you have at a position that is already weak, you have issues.
Without Caldwell, we would have had greater problems last year.
I dont understand your point. You lose your #1 receiver, have a bunch of nobodies behind him, and thats not a problem?
Do you think you dont need WRs?
Turner seems to be more concerned than you.
yes but we make up for it with gates and LT, two things the pats are not even close to having
sure you have much better depth at wr on paper, but offensively we got it covered, and like we all know, parker was going into the season #3 at best
| 14 | 499 |
| 20 | 683 |
| 13 | 688 |
| 17 | 543 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 6 - June 21 (Through 26yrs)











