Does This Look Familiar?

[Mr. Plow]

I can't escape the feeling I've seen this somewhere before...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/s...ent-about-article-and-the-times-responds.html

Help me out here.

 

[ivanvamp]

It is very ironic that the NFL...

(1) Is very quick to respond in "print" (i.e., the internet) when something is published that they don't like, but still haven't found the time to correct the Mortensen tweet and story that THEY leaked that set the entire narrative for Deflategate.

(2) Said that the NYT article was bogus because they "had no direct evidence", when the NFL itself used those SAME EXACT WORDS to describe the evidence they had against Brady and the Pats, which, of course, didn't stop them from levying the harshest penalty in NFL history for something that the rule book listed as a $25,000 fine.

(3) Said that the NYT cherry-picked information, when the NFL and Exponent and Ted Wells did EXACTLY that against the Patriots.

I mean, seriously.

 

[ausbacker]

Yeah, the NFL, being the duplicitous c**ts they are, have no problems issuing immediate responses to correct what they perceive to be misinformation or the misrepresentation of facts.

Many people have taken the NFL to task for failing to correct the inaccuracies of their Defamegate strategic leaks.

 

[ViperGTS]

Yeah, the NFL, being the duplicitous ****s they are, have no problems issuing immediate responses to correct what they perceive to be misinformation or the misrepresentation of facts.

Many people have taken the NFL to task for failing to correct the inaccuracies of their Defamegate strategic leaks.

You used a mean word to describe the NFL.

I'm going to tell my Daddy Rodger. He's gonna be mad.

 

[IcyPatriot]

The statement said the article was “contradicted by clear facts” and that The Times “published pages of innuendo and speculation.”

so rich .............. amazing actually but the expected norm.