Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,296
- Reaction score
- 3,986
Infectious personality aside -- -- there are three main components to Gronk's value:
He certainly is double or triple-teamed at times, especially if you count attempted jams or whatever. But it's not obvious to me that he demands more attention than a very top WR.
Obviously, Gronk is a vastly better blocker than any WR, and indeed better than his fellow TEs, at the least the ones we notice because they also do some receiving. (Is he really a better blocker than other teams' equivalents to Cannon or Fleming? Probably not.) On the other hand, the Patriots' running game, while decent, is nothing special.
So is Gronk really more valuable than the top couple WRs? If so, why?
- Receiving stats.
- Coverage and other attention he draws, allowing other guys to put up receiving stats.
- Blocking.
He certainly is double or triple-teamed at times, especially if you count attempted jams or whatever. But it's not obvious to me that he demands more attention than a very top WR.
Obviously, Gronk is a vastly better blocker than any WR, and indeed better than his fellow TEs, at the least the ones we notice because they also do some receiving. (Is he really a better blocker than other teams' equivalents to Cannon or Fleming? Probably not.) On the other hand, the Patriots' running game, while decent, is nothing special.
So is Gronk really more valuable than the top couple WRs? If so, why?












