manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 30,077
- Reaction score
- 25,532
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You need a trade partner to want someone at #32 of those "not so best player "leftExactly, that's why I think you trade down, add picks and spread the risk
Perriman to Baltimore is scary, but OTOH that was a prime spot for Malcolm Brown to go as a Ngata replacement.
Well I would think they just give the player an opportunity the drug was purchased legally, much like taking a prescription drug.I just mean that's probably the part of the basis for the NFL banning it, along with the fact that they just don't want their players on it.
Imagine if they said "OK you guys can get blazed whenever in Denver and Seattle, NOWHERE ELSE THO!" There could be multiple kinds of consequences.
Well, that's working out great. I'm watching the NBA playoffs and following the draft on Twitter and here.Network is milking it to fit in commercials
Ravens about to pick either a CB or DT. I hate those guys, they are always taking our players
I'd give you 20 to 1 odds it's not.DGB it has to be he's best value
You need a trade partner to want someone at #32 of those "not so best player "left
May as well pick at 32. They still get an extra year on the rookie deal, right?
DGB it has to be he's best value
I think that it'll be more of a conversation if more states legalize, but ultimately the NFL can ban whatever substances it wants to, it's a private enterprise. I don't care that much either way, just sayin'.Well I would think they just give the player an opportunity the drug was purchased legally, much like taking a prescription drug.