SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Just out of curiosity, where are you getting this from, because this is what I am looking for on NFL.com, which is where I would go for official stories, and I don't see it there one way or another. If we are the ones responsible for providing correctly inflated balls, investigating the Patriots, not just the ball, seems to be logically implied, so I don't see it outrageous. I understand people are upset, I am too, because we are all tired of this, but if it is the NFL doing this investigation, and have admitted to doing it, I think most of our fan base is currently guilty of trying to shoot the messenger. The media reports on the smallest of issues to get a hit, so something like the NFL admitting they are investigating this isn't the media out to get us, it's the media doing their job, something they have always done.
Personally. I'm just interested in facts at this point. It's definitely something that is possible, at least at the college level, since Lane Kiffin has been caught and fined for it. It's likely possible at the NFL level too, otherwise they wouldn't be investigating it. It's definitely something that could offer some advantage, otherwise there would be no fine and there would be no rule against it.
Now, IMO, more importantly, I think is the listed punishment. If indeed the punishment for deflated or inflated balls was written and known to be only 25,000.....then it doesn't seem like a big deterrent. Unfortunately the cost of perception is much larger, so I still hope this is totally false.
They get handed balls by the attendants. Do you think a ref can call a game with a sack of 12 game balls slung on his back?So your saying the refs have no balls during the game?
Nobody cares about the Panthers. They don't have the success that we do.
And nothing came of it. We should be awarded draft compensation for Woody and tampering and there should come nothing of this "investigation" if Goodell and his league office wish to remain consistancy and integrity.
If Goodell treats teams differently in similar situations where prior precedents have been set, then The Emporer truly has no clothes.
Hes still trying to understand what a "source" is.
Q. Tedy, love your chats! What do you make of the report of the Patriots using under-inflated footballs in last evening's game? To me, it's getting a little bit old. And for a player, it has to be as well that every time you win a big game you're accused of cheating. -- Brandon (Cincinnati)
A. You're exactly right, Brandon. It does get old. Coaches complaining they weren't ready for formations. I've heard it all. There is a long line of people who want to find some excuse for how the Patriots have had success for so long, and the bottom line is that it's good coaching and good players.
He's confused. He thought it was suggested that he find multiple sauces, so he chose Hollandaise, BBQ, Teriyaki and Blueberry Fudge.
-and then for dessert...
It's not that hard to understand. A ball was removed from the game. The league investigates balls removed from games.
Everything else, including any reason at all to have a hint of suspicion of any culpability by the Patriots is all made up and conjecture.
Your inference that the Patriots are responsible is adding to the confusion. The Patriots provide balls for the referees to test, and the referees tested them.
Here is an example. If there were a story that a Colt fan was accosted outside the stadium, and the police were looking into, and someone reporting that story said that if it was Bill Belichick who accosted the Colt fan, then he could end up in jail and not coach in the SB, how much credence would you give that?
There is an investigation and someone speculated on the investigation, and people have been accosted before.
Let em hate. We will win the superbowl and they can talk all they wantI can't even describe how cringeworthy it is to see the "cheater" accusations. Not to mention the sore-loser, childish whining and crying. Whether it's about this or spygate.
Dean Blandino quite specifically says the ball gets investigated when it gets taken out of circulation.
He also said it isn't uncommon for it to happen.
Bob Kravitz has trolled everyone, exploded it out of all proportion because he can't handle his team getting stomped on (again) and now we have this nothingness to deal with.
What? The refs are responsible for making sure the balls are inflated to between 12.5 - 13.5 psi. They do this 2.5 hours before a game. Each team gives the ref 12 balls to check. If they're not in that range, the ref inflates them so they are.I'm not inferring it. The rule states it doesn't it? We are also responsible for inflating them, to proper pressure, prior to giving them to the referees, yes? The referees only test for the correct pressure or weight. If I'm understanding correctly, unlike the kicking balls, these don't come straight from the manufacturer. We provide them. Each team also plays with their own balls. So if the ball in question, was one of ours, and there is any issue with properly inflated balls, we're the first they are going to question.
But if this were true, the Pats were winning the game soundly so the only advantage it would have brought would be for the colts.Short of an attendant letting air out or a player somehow doing it, it's all on the refs. They inspect the balls.
Maybe the weather the wetness and the general pounding the balls took caused one or two to leak a bit.
That's your only option..a player with a pin to take some air our or an attendant.