Why did this team sign Tebow?

[belichick010405]

Oh come on belichick, it's not like this is a "Flat Earth Society" thing.

seinfeld millennium George tries looses his job - YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fofcLXshq_8

Demos - here is the first Seinfeld episode that I would watch.

 

[Ironman44]

Demosthenes, you have been completely pummeled in this thread and I am embarrassed for you.

The fact that you did not know when the 21st Century began and then tried to call out a poster who was correct about it is even more embarrassing.

Get your head out of Tim Tebows rear. He is even embarrassed for you and you probably stalk him anyway - When you are not in front of your TT shine in your basement.

You keep using the word embarrassing a lot, the only thing I see is someone who has become obsessed with Tebow (you) and can not stop posting about him and attacks other posters on a personal level.... constantly.

 

[Armchair Quarterback]

I've looked it up many times and I fully understand the points on both sides. I know that there's no year 0 in the Gregorian calendar. I, and many others, don't see the reasoning behind carrying that flaw over through the years.

Care to elaborate on these long held beliefs of yours? Who are the many others that you align yourself with?

 

[Demosthenes]

seinfeld millennium George tries looses his job - YouTube

Seinfeld - Newman's Millennium Party - YouTube

Demos - here is the first Seinfeld episode that I would watch.

Thanks......

 

[Bruins29]

You keep using the word embarrassing a lot, the only thing I see is someone who has become obsessed with Tebow (you) and can not stop posting about him and attacks other posters on a personal level.... constantly.

Thanks! Gotcha...I'll get back to you on that.

 

[Fawn Lebowitz]

seinfeld millennium George tries looses his job - YouTube

Seinfeld - Newman's Millennium Party - YouTube

Demos - here is the first Seinfeld episode that I would watch.

That's gold Jerry! Gold!

 

[Demosthenes]

Care to elaborate on these long held beliefs of yours? Who are the many others that you align yourself with?

Thread has been derailed enough. Will be happy to discuss it via PM or in a new thread in some other subsection. Let me know.

 

[Ironman44]

Thanks! Gotcha...I'll get back to you on that.

You are welcome !

I am sure I will see you posting a few dozen times on the next Tebow discussion. I know for a fact there is a help group that deals with Tebow obsession. Its not too late...let me know. I am close to the founder and some of the counselors. Obsessing over a QB3 is not something to be embarrassed about but its never too late to change.

I am here for you.

 

[Demosthenes]

Some actual quotes would be nice.

Missed this in all the replies. You still want the quotes ? Or pass ?

 

[Bruins29]

I am sure I will see you posting a few dozen times on the next Tebow discussion. I know for a fact there is a help group that deals with Tebow obsession. Its not too late...let me know. I am close to the founder and some of the counselors. Obsessing over a QB3 is not something to be embarrassed about but its never too late to change.

I am here for you.

Thanks! But I am not really obsessing about Tebow. I am obsessing about people obsessing about Tebow.

Is that a separate group?

Or to save time PM me your thoughts and I can perhaps tell you why. ok?

 

[Ironman44]

Thanks! But I am not really obsessing about Tebow. I am obsessing about people obsessing about Tebow.

Is that a separate group?

Or to save time PM me your thoughts and I can perhaps tell you why. ok?

hhhmma a sub group that is anti - tebow fan is something we have all talked about for a while now . I think there might be something there but the research has not caught up yet.

There is a pill that can cure both temporarily but the side effects are brutal.

 

[Bruins29]

hhhmma a sub group that is anti - tebow fan is something we have all talked about for a while now . I think there might be something there but the research has not caught up yet.

There is a pill that can cure both temporarily but the side effects are brutal.

Ahhhh We gotta find something else. I need that to work.

I guess its gonna be drug free. I will refrain about the talking about the peoples talking about the Tim Tebows. It will hurt, I will have withdrawal, but with help from you guys I think I can do it.

 

[situational_awareness]

And thank you for adding nothing once again. You just cant keep away can you.

Lol. What is there to add to this discussion? You can go away just as easily as I can, but I'm not even here trying to argue or add anything because I'm sick of it. You seem to want to keep talking about it ad-nauseum.

Let me sum up every Tebow thread in the world:

"Tebow sucks"
"No he doesn't"
"He can't throw"
"He did it in college"
"This ain't college"
"He did it in Denver"
"Denver's defense won those games"
"He should have started with the Jets"
"He couldn't even beat Sanchez out"
"He didn't get a chance"
"Yeah because he sucks"
"He worked on his throwing motion"
"It still looks bad"
"Looked good enough for Belichick to sign him"
"He won't make the team"
"Yes he will"
"Mallet is better"
"Why is Mallet better"
"He looks better"
"What are his results"
"I don't know, but he looks so much better"
"Tebow's not that bad, just needs reps"
"Tebow sucks"
"No he doesn't"
"He can't throw"
"He did it in college"
"This ain't college"
"He did it in Denver"
"Denver's defense won those games"
"He should have started with the Jets"
"He couldn't even beat Sanchez out"
"He didn't get a chance"
"Yeah because he sucks"
"He worked on his throwing motion"
"It still looks bad"
"Looked good enough for Belichick to sign him"
"He won't make the team"
"Yes he will"
"Mallet is better"
"Why is Mallet better"
"He looks better"
"What are his results"
"I don't know, but he looks so much better"
"Tebow's not that bad, just needs reps"
"Tebow sucks"

etc... etc... etc...

 

[Brady6]

Re: Re: Why did this team sign Tebow?

Damned if Josh wouldn't have figured that out in the many hours he spent with Tebow prior to moving up in the draft to take him in the first round.

Then again, there have been many coaches/analysts who have gone on record as saying that Tebow possesses a very good Football IQ.

It likely isn't a lack of intelligence; it is probably the fact he is dyslexic.

Dyslexia*is characterized by difficulty with learning to read fluently and with accurate comprehension despite normal intelligence.This includes difficulty with*phonological awareness,phonological*decoding, processing speed,orthographic coding,*auditory short-term memory, language skills/verbal comprehension, and/or*rapid naming.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexia

 

[fnordcircle]

Demos, I marvel at your posting stamina. I can get about 3 posts deep into an online debate before I remember nothing anyone says matters and I go count the wrinkles in my scrotum.

 

[Armchair Quarterback]

Thread has been derailed enough. Will be happy to discuss it via PM or in a new thread in some other subsection. Let me know.

Even though I know you of all people wouldn't want to derail a thread, a simple answer to a direct question would suffice. This thread has over 350 responses, I think it can handle one more.

 

[Armchair Quarterback]

Missed this in all the replies. You still want the quotes ? Or pass ?

That's the way it usually works.

 

[fnordcircle]

Yep. This is how some of the Pro Tebow posters come across. No matter what you tell them or show them or they see, it will never bring them to reality.

Fun Fact: Belichick is Pro-Tebow.

 

[sb1]

This is getting way off topic, but, the start of the century is a topic still under debate across the globe. Looking at the question that I asked, the 1990's started in 1990 of course. That decade went from 1990 to 1999. Why in the world would you break a decade up and try to claim that 9/10's of the decade was in one century, but that one other year of that decade is in another century ?

Counting "Decades" =/= Centuries.

The 21st century started in 2001. There was no year zero.

Hence, last century was January 1 1901-December 31 2000.

Just because you don't understand why that is so, doesn't mean it isn't so....

 

[sb1]

Anyways, getting back on track. This was the statement that SB1 put forth:



And his escape from Brady being an example of him being wrong is that Brady was in the last century.

No it was not my "escape". Your Brady example was a poor one, for all three reasons already stated. (and 2 of which ignored by you...hmmm). I think it makes sense that a longtime Patriots fan would be able to speak for the history of this team better than someone who just started following them this year because of one player.


Nothing further to debate, move on.