- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,801
- Reaction score
- 20,475
That's a great post for an internet forum but meanwhile in the real world, a lawyer would advise an innocent client to allow the search and arrange for it to be done (with the lawyer present, of course).
Absolutely not. No lawyer in their right mind would recommend that. They would always, without exception, recommend allowing the search only once a warrant was presented. Period. The bottom line is that the police will get a warrant if they have any valid reason to search your house, anyway.
On a side note, I was questioned in a felony case a few years back, and I gave a statement to the police. I was not a suspect and had nothing to do with the crime--I just allegedly knew about it, as the primary suspect was a good friend--so I figured that I was in the clear.
Months later, I'm subpoena'd for the trial, and asked to recount the events to the best of my knowledge. I answered honestly, but it turned out that there were some small discrepancies between the statement that I gave to police and what I recounted in court. Nothing intentional, of course--just mis-remembering some small stuff 6+ months after the fact.
Stuff like this happens, and if I was even remotely a suspect in the case, I could have been screwed. My credibility would have become awfully suspect, in the jury's eyes. All because I gave the police a statement that I didn't even have to give them in the first place.
No offense to you individually, SB39, but a lot of the posts on here seem to pretty clearly be coming from people who have no experience actually dealing with police questioning. It's incredibly easy to slip up and incriminate yourself, even when you're 100% innocent. Talking to the police just opens you up to vulnerability, let alone letting them search your house. Doesn't matter if you're innocent.











