nowayback
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2006
- Messages
- 1,698
- Reaction score
- 1,029
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Agreed, but the OP posted a hypothetical and I'm ok with it, but this will be one of the more competitive SB journeys (by both AFC/NFC) we've seen in a few years.Let us not count our chickens before they have hatched, nor skin the bear we haven't caught yet.
Let us not count our chickens before they have hatched, nor pluck the raven we haven't caught yet.
SB 4-2 4-0
CG 6-1 4-3
DR 7-2 7-2
WC 2-1 1-2
It's pretty obvious Brady is superior statistically if Brady wins it all this season. Mediots like to ignore the fact that Brady will be 6-1 vs Joe Cool's 4-3 in the championship game. No disrespect to Joe Cool. I think comparing two people from different era's is a bunch of horse****. But statistically Brady will be superior.
Let us not count our chickens before they have hatched, nor skin the bear we haven't caught yet.
Yeah, remember how everyone was saying manning will be greatest of all time if he won the NO SB and then didnt ?
A pertinent part of comparing across eras: Montana's was an era of NFC dominance. If you won the NFC, you pretty much had done it.
4-2 is better than 4-0. Clearly, the winning percentage isn't the same but competing for the opportunity to win the ultimate prize has to be view and considered favorable.
First it's guys saying the Pats aren't a dynasty because of three close SB wins... then it's saying the 49ers/NFC weren't dominant because some of the wins were close... :confused2:
I once made a Russian guy happy by dropping it on him.
Whats better, if Brady wins 4th with 2 losses or Montana 4-0
arnt 2 losses better then not even making it to SB? Montana just lost sooner.
if Montana only played 4 yrs and was 4-0 yes. But thats not the case.