Content Post The 2012 season: the Jets [Mod Edit: STILL] suck

[Brady_to_Moss]

If Sanchez were to lose his job, I feel we would be in for a few years of mediocrity

HAHAHAAHAHAH They are already in mediocrity even with sanchez...these fans are ******* clueless

 

[Brady_to_Moss]

Ohh I cant wait for people to eat there words. - Jets Insider.com Forums


more gold

 

[Joker]

they are going to go 4-4 and meet the Pats...after they win they'll be 5-3...

yeah...uh...wha????????????????????

------------------------>

 

[Brady_to_Moss]

I got what he meant. He meant that he see's them at 4-4 at the bye..but if they beat the pats..they will be 5-3 at the bye that's IF they beat the Colts, Pats AND MIAMI

 

[cmasspatsfan]

I dont pay a lot of attention to the Jets schedule but is this true?

There is a reason nobody has faith. Do you realize the Jets haven't beat a team with a winning record in 2 years?

 

[Joker]

you do realize that this is a Jet fan impersonating an undercover Pats troll so he can log on with his moderator handle and declare it to be a Pats troll because he's so stupid and all Pats fans are stupid...which sort of proves that Jet fan is a good two steps below common moron...it makes no sense for any other fan to attempt to troll a site populated entirely by its own trolls...

 

[ATippett56]

Same Old Jets, same Old LOLs!

Jets Insider.com Forums - View Single Post - Ohh I cant wait for people to eat there words.

 

[Tunescribe]

Same Old Jets, same Old LOLs!

Jets Insider.com Forums - View Single Post - Ohh I cant wait for people to eat there words.

There words? Where words?

 

[Joker]

 

[ATippett56]

There words? Where words?

there and their; buy and bye!

:scream:

 

[reflexblue]

There all laughing at us, they're calling us clowns Thats right ed they're/we're calling you and the jests clowns ...fireman ed on the field.

fireman ed opener - YouTube

 

[Delicate Genius]

************. I knew he was bad and all......but wow.

His completion percentage is 5.8% lower than the next QB.

48.4% is probably flattering too.

Week 1: 19/27 (70.4%)
Weeks 2-5: 58/132 (43.9%)

I posted this earlier in the thread but Sanchez fell apart/came down to earth after the opening drive in Pittsburgh in Week 2. He was 4/5 to start the game; he's 54/127 (42.5%) since. That's amazing.

 

[Deus Irae]

Pack it up, Lords and Ladies. I've just won the internet with this find:

let's be realistic here, other than gronk, the pats talent level is no better than the jets. edelman = kurley welker = santonio woodhead = mcknight
their line has been decimated this year too.

difference is, the pats have brady. put sanchez on the pats and your team is worse off than the jets.

put brady on this jets team and they win 12 games easily.

Jets Insider.com Forums - View Single Post - NFL.com: "Mark Sanchez is on his way out as New York Jets quarterback"

i'll give you that loyd is better than stephen hill. but, hernandez = keller.
as for ridley, the only reason he is running all over the place is because defenses are focused purely on stopping brady. when the pats try to run, opposing defenses aren't prepared for it.

as i said, put sanchez on the pats, and the running game will be stopped in it's tracks. once defenses gear up for the pats run, ridley will make blair thomas look like walter payton.

http://www.jetsinsider.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4642558&postcount=87

Listen, i know that pats fans think that they have all-pros at every position, but that is not the case. put keller on the pats and he is just as good as hernandez.

everytime a WR or other "all pro" offensive player leaves the pats, they suck on other teams. (deion branch anyone?)

my point is, great QB's like brady will make the players around them great. without brady, the pats are just as crappy as the jets.

http://www.jetsinsider.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4642584&postcount=91

 

[chasa]

did any of those jets fans recall the pats going 11-5 when we lost brady for the season?

 

[The Gr8est]

Pack it up, Lords and Ladies. I've just won the internet with this find:



Jets Insider.com Forums - View Single Post - NFL.com: "Mark Sanchez is on his way out as New York Jets quarterback"



Jets Insider.com Forums - View Single Post - NFL.com: "Mark Sanchez is on his way out as New York Jets quarterback"



Jets Insider.com Forums - View Single Post - NFL.com: "Mark Sanchez is on his way out as New York Jets quarterback"

I weep at the stupidity of ratkind.




"let's be realistic here, other than gronk, the pats talent level is no better than the jets. edelman = kurley welker = santonio woodhead = mcknight
their line has been decimated this year too.

difference is, the pats have brady. put sanchez on the pats and your team is worse off than the jets.

put brady on this jets team and they win 12 games easily. "



So by that rationale, if you put Scarlett Johansen and Rosie O'Donnell in the same sexy outfit, you'd be unable to tell them apart; in fact, Rosie might even outshine Scarlett.

 

[Deus Irae]

I weep at the stupidity of ratkind.

Ok, so those posts got me to comparing:

Brady - Sanchez
Ridley - Greene
Woodhead - McKnight
Solder - Ferguson
Mankins - Slauson
Wendell - Mangold
Connolly - Moore
Vollmer - Howard
Gronk - Cumberland
Hernandez - Keller
Lloyd - Holmes
Welker - Kerley/Schilens
Edelman - Hill


I get 1 clear win for the Jets (Mangold)

I get 9 clear wins for the Patriots (Brady, Ridley, Woodhead, Mankins, Vollmer, Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd, Welker)
Welker

I get 3 arguables/incompletes (Solder/Ferguson, Connolly/Moore, Edelman/Hill)

Must be because I'm such a homer.

 

[patchick]

Must be because I'm such a homer.

Deus, the problem is that you're not factoring in the JetsMultiplier(TM).

Remember that each individual Jets offensive player's statistics are depressed by the low level of surrounding talent, so you have to multiply all of their stats by 1.6 to determine their Patriots-equivalent production. Once you do that, you discover that the Jets offense actually has the same talent level as the Patriots!

For example, Shonn Greene's 2.9 ypc, times the JetsMultiplier, yields Ridley's 4.8 ypc. Marc Sanchez' 66.6 passer rating (AKA "The Rating of the Beast"), times the JetsMultipler, yields Brady's 103 passer rating.

In other words, the Jets are all so bad that it obscures how good they all are. I learned this by reading apologias for each player on JetsInsider.

 

[BSR]

did any of those jets fans recall the pats going 11-5 when we lost brady for the season?

They only recall that if their argument is that he isn't that great.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

I was thinking about the Holmes and Revis injuries and what they might mean for the division, and I have a suspicion that these will ultimately be the gift that keeps on giving.

-I expect the Jets to tank this year, but the uncertainty of football means I cannot commit to to a number. I think they win between 5 and 9 games, with most likely 7. If they lose to the Colts next week, they could easily be 2-5 and it's over.

-The Jets were contenders to be .500 with Holmes and Revis and nothing better, but they'll certainly make some great excuses all off-season. The funny thing is, though, that their GM, coach, and owner will be the first to buy into the excuse that this should have been a great team. A couple of young players will like adequate since they are in big roles, and these dumb Jets fans (and dumb Jets coaches) will start betting big heads, as now they have Holmes and Revis coming back to go along with "stars" like Kerley and Hill.

-So next year, with their cap hell situation, I think they stick with Sanchez as his "last chance" to prove it. I bet the Jets get an easy schedule because of their putrid record ride a patchwork defense to 8 wins and miss the playoffs. But now they are stuck with Sanchez and Ryan again for another season, as they are "a team on the rise" that has apparently just gone through rebuilding (although they really haven't.) It will be a final "prove it" year for both of them, unless they are given another year.

So what does this mean? The excuses made for Revis and Holmes will probably keep Ryan and Sanchez in New York until at least 2014, as their predictable owner is a dumb fool who will read the hype and excuses. Couldn't be better news for Pats fans.

 

[Brady_to_Moss]

I was thinking about the Holmes and Revis injuries and what they might mean for the division, and I have a suspicion that these will ultimately be the gift that keeps on giving.

-I expect the Jets to tank this year, but the uncertainty of football means I cannot commit to to a number. I think they win between 5 and 9 games, with most likely 7. If they lose to the Colts next week, they could easily be 2-5 and it's over.

-The Jets were contenders to be .500 with Holmes and Revis and nothing better, but they'll certainly make some great excuses all off-season. The funny thing is, though, that their GM, coach, and owner will be the first to buy into the excuse that this should have been a great team. A couple of young players will like adequate since they are in big roles, and these dumb Jets fans (and dumb Jets coaches) will start betting big heads, as now they have Holmes and Revis coming back to go along with "stars" like Kerley and Hill.

-So next year, with their cap hell situation, I think they stick with Sanchez as his "last chance" to prove it. I bet the Jets get an easy schedule because of their putrid record ride a patchwork defense to 8 wins and miss the playoffs. But now they are stuck with Sanchez and Ryan again for another season, as they are "a team on the rise" that has apparently just gone through rebuilding (although they really haven't.) It will be a final "prove it" year for both of them, unless they are given another year.

So what does this mean? The excuses made for Revis and Holmes will probably keep Ryan and Sanchez in New York until at least 2014, as their predictable owner is a dumb fool who will read the hype and excuses. Couldn't be better news for Pats fans.

Next year won't be cap hell for them..scott will be dumped...pace..thomas who makes obsurd ammounts of $$ ect they will still have $$ to play around with