I hear this "QB was the same" thing a lot, but what difference does the quarerback thing really make. Isn't this just a distinction to get around the fact that BB lost two "second chance" games in his first year here when we weren't very good? I don't think it had much to do with who the quarterback was or wasn't. Anyway, I think these are the "second chance" games during BB's tenure here. I'm not really sure what any of this proves, since there are plenty of games where we've beaten a team early in the year only to be beaten by the team later in the year. Anyway, here the results of games played against opponents that beat us earlier in the year in the BB era:
2000
Jets -- Loss
Dolphins -- Loss
Bills -- Win
2001
Jets -- Win
Dolphins -- Win
Rams -- Win
2002
Dolphins -- Win
2003
Bills -- Win
2004
Steelers -- Win
2005
Broncos -- Loss
2006
Jets -- Win
So it looks like 8-3 to me, or 8-1 if you disregard 2000 or take the QB thing to heart.
To me it shows the ability of our coaching staff to makes intra-season adjustments vs. the competition. When a team's QB changes, the team's entire offensive dynamics often change, as well.