PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Bring on the Ravens

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get ready for a week long mediot love fest on the possibility of an all Harbaugh SB.

It's going to be an All-Harbaugh Pro Bowl (losing coaches of conference championship games coach there).
 
My only comment is that Tebow and McGahee had better games and more yardage tha Flacco and Rice, of the winning Ravens.

If not for their long marches of 2 yards and 35 yards, they would have lost...
 
Sure, whatever excusues you have, I'd love to hear them. I'm really not sure what an injured Brady and lack of talent on offense has to do with us dropping 33 points on you.
You won't be dropping 33 points on us this time. You better pray your defense gets a better pass rush than they did today, or your overrated team will pay a big price.
 
Yet, they are not equal. Your offense has not scored more than 24 points since late November. And your defense has not played an offense remotely close to New Englands. The best offense you faced (the Chargers) put 34 on you guys and made your defense look old and slow. The only other good offense you played was Houston in week 6 and they didn't have Andre Johnson.

Our offense has scored 40+ in 3 of our last 4 games. Our defenses are allowing the same amount of points over the last 4 games against similar competition. Over that span your defense has allowed 19.3 PPG against offenses that average 21 PPG. The Pats defense has allowed 19.5 against offenses that average 20.6 PPG.

I simply do not see any area where your team has an advantage coming into this game.


x team did this to y team does not mean z team will be able to as well. SD's basketball player sized recievers have always presented a matchup hell for our DBs. Welker, not so much. Webb is an ideal matchup for a guy like him.

If Webb contains Welker, which is very possible, that lets us focus on taking out those TE. Then what? Is NE going to beat us on the ground? Not likely. Certainly aren't going to beat us with your defense.

This game isn't going to be the cake walk you people think it is.
 
You won't be dropping 33 points on us this time. You better pray your defense gets a better pass rush than they did today, or your overrated team will pay a big price.

My overrated team? How many playoff teams did you beat this year not named Denver?
 
My only comment is that Tebow and McGahee had better games and more yardage tha Flacco and Rice, of the winning Ravens.

If not for their long marches of 2 yards and 35 yards, they would have lost...

Difference is, we played an actual defense today, one of the best in the league.
There are college defenses better than yours, so obviously the Denver Tebows would put up prettier stats, while we got the win instead.
 
My overrated team? How many playoff teams did you beat this year not named Denver?

Last year we went 7-1 vs playoff teams and went one and done regular season doesn't matter anymore
 
My overrated team? How many playoff teams did you beat this year not named Denver?
Oh, I'm sorry. Are we supposed to be afraid of a team that could barely beat TJ Yates and hasn't played a real offense all year? This isn't 2009.

PS. The only other playoff team we met this year got embarrassed by the Broncos, who we dominated last night. 6 TDs, 15 negative plays on defense. We can handle Baltimore.
 
You have to look at the facts of today's game. Ravens only won by a touchdown, even with all of those turnovers. Beyond that the Ravens D allowed Andre Johnson to go for 132 yards and Foster went for 111 yards. So this defense has shown its definitely vulnerable. And this was against TJ Yates, a rookie. This year we have a whole group of RB's who are the anti laurence maroney and more receiving weapons so that Welker isn't the only one being relied upon.

TJ Yates - 17 / 35 for 184 yards 0 TD 3 INT

doesn't really sound like we are vulnerable to me.

And yes, Foster averaged 4.9 YPC with a TD. He is also far better than anything in NE backfield.
 
Oh, I'm sorry. Are we supposed to be afraid of a team that could barely beat TJ Yates and hasn't played a real offense all year? This isn't 2009.

PS. The only other playoff team we met this year got embarrassed by the Broncos, who we dominated last night. 6 TDs, 15 negative plays on defense. We can handle Baltimore.



That's what you guys said last time we met in the playoffs

How many real defenses did you play this year? PIT? How did that game turn out for you?
 
Last edited:
Difference is, we played an actual defense today, one of the best in the league.
There are college defenses better than yours, so obviously the Denver Tebows would put up prettier stats, while we got the win instead.

Look..you played a better defense. you have played better defenses and beaten them like the steelers and texans and the bengals. You held TJ yates to 3 picks and less than 200 yards passing..you lost to powerweights like the seattle seahawks but those were just complacency otherwise you should be 16-0 ideally. And very importantly you just beat us in 2009 so you should beat us now even worse because we have worser defense. Anything else I missed to cover ?
 
The cRavens are gonna get destroyed this year. Mark my words people
 
one thing to keep in mind is stevan ridley. while his opportunities have been limited he has an average of 5.1 ypg. Is he foster? no of course not but the kid certainly knows how to run hard. Yates 0 td's come from a rookie who made bad decisions. I didn't see anywhere during the game where the ravens forced a turnover, just a third string rookie that made poor decisions and threw into tight coverage that a veteran qb would have diagnosed. Additionally, he wasn't pressured at all by the ravens pass rush. Give brady as much time as Yates had and its checkmate.
 
Look..you played a better defense. you have played better defenses and beaten them like the steelers and texans and the bengals. You held TJ yates to 3 picks and less than 200 yards passing..you lost to powerweights like the seattle seahawks but those were just complacency otherwise you should be 16-0 ideally. And very importantly you just beat us in 2009 so you should beat us now even worse because we have worser defense. Anything else I missed to cover ?

I never said we are going to "beat you worse". I have no clue who will win this game, it will go either way. I'm simply saying not to reserve your SB tickets just yet, we're not Denver, and if you win, it is going to take everything you've got. Bring anything less than your A game, you're done.
 
I never said we are going to "beat you worse". I have no clue who will win this game, it will go either way. I'm simply saying not to reserve your SB tickets just yet, we're not Denver, and if you win, it is going to take everything you've got. Bring anything less than your A game, you're done.

Well..stating the obvious like "Bring anything less than your A game, you're done." means nothing. And yes you said the pats are favored only because they are at home. Tell me this honestly - if you think the ravens play the same quality of defense they played today vs the texans and iam just talking the quality...not those dumb picks t j yates threw, you can win next week? Arent you as a raven fan not concerned that yates was not touched today ? That he completed passes to wide open ken walter and andre johnson in the middle of the field in between his bone headed throws into double coverage with ed reed ? That with 1:37 to go in the game and 1st and 10 at your 40 yard line with 4 downs to go you expected him to throw a bomb in triple coverage...?
Look, if the pats protect brady like they did vs denver they should win easily. If you think the ravens can play the same way and expect INTs then..maybe it may happen and pats do throw dumb picks and fumbles but less chance.
 
x team did this to y team does not mean z team will be able to as well. SD's basketball player sized recievers have always presented a matchup hell for our DBs. Welker, not so much. Webb is an ideal matchup for a guy like him.

If Webb contains Welker, which is very possible, that lets us focus on taking out those TE. Then what? Is NE going to beat us on the ground? Not likely. Certainly aren't going to beat us with your defense.

This game isn't going to be the cake walk you people think it is.

I simply pointed out a fact that your defense has not played any high end offenses other than SD and Houston missing its biggest playmaker in the passing game.

I don't see anyone stopping Welker in single coverage. You have to bracket him. Then you can double one of the TE's, but not both. And who is going to cover the TE's? Lewis can't run with either of them? I think Suggs will have to get in the face of one of them and jam them at the LOS. Which will slow down his pass rush. It will be a pick your poison situation.

The only way you will be able to stop this offense is if Ngata and company bring pressure right up the middle. The Ravens will have to be able to get to Brady only bringing 3-4 allowing them to drop 7-8 into coverage. Otherwise one or more of Welker, Gronkowski, Hernandez or Branch will eat you up. This offense is playing on another level right now. Even with their slow starts at times through the year. Particularly the last two games of the regular season, they were down 17-3 at halftime and then score 24 points in the second half. Again shutout in the 1st quarter against Buffalo and then hang 49 on the board in 3 quarters.

Don't under estimate the Pats run game. Its not Arian Foster and Ben Tate but it is very solid. Ridley has been very explosive, but has a case of fumbleitis. Lawfirm is a 3 yards and a cloud of dust guy that always falls forward. Obviously Woodhead is a change up guy that is shifty and hard to find.

This last ranked defense thing that your boys on the Ravens forum keep pointing out is comical. Yeah they give up a lot of yards, but not points. They are 15th in the league in points. To put into perspective the Browns are 5th allowing 19.2, the Bengals are 9th allowing 20.2....the Pats allow 21.4 PPG. And as I pointed out earlier over the past 4 games the two teams are allowing the same amount of points against similar offenses.

Your offense is not very good and is centered around 1 player. Smith is explosive and has the ability to make big plays in the passing game. Boldin is a solid possesion receiver. The problem is your QB is not very good and has a hard time making big plays in the passing game.

And yes I watch a lot of your games. Your team will come to play, I'm sure of that. But I don't think they have the horses on offense to score enough points to win. And I don't think you have what it takes on defense to stop this offense. If you played a team with a competent QB today you would have lost. Yates threw some dumb ass Int's that first one was terrible. The 2nd one was essentially a decent punt. The third one was numb, 4th and 2 and you chuck it deep? That won't happen with Brady.

Again the way I see it, you have to get pressure up the middle while being able to drop 7+ into coverage. Brady has to be off, and the Ravens have to get turnovers. Ray Rice has to have a career day and you can't turn the ball over. IMO, all that has to happen in order for you guys to win.
 
one thing to keep in mind is stevan ridley. while his opportunities have been limited he has an average of 5.1 ypg. Is he foster? no of course not but the kid certainly knows how to run hard. Yates 0 td's come from a rookie who made bad decisions. I didn't see anywhere during the game where the ravens forced a turnover, just a third string rookie that made poor decisions and threw into tight coverage that a veteran qb would have diagnosed. Additionally, he wasn't pressured at all by the ravens pass rush. Give brady as much time as Yates had and its checkmate.

Ridley may get his chances, but they'll be sparingly. Very sparingly. Even in the 4th quarter, trying to run out clock with a lead, Ridley will not see the ball too much. It would be a prime BJGE moment, as his ball security would obviously come first.

With Woodhead and BJGE getting the majority of the touches, and the Pats likely playing a primarily heavy attack passing game, I don't see too much opportunity for Ridley unfortunately.

His fumble certainly did not help his cause either. Belichick will not screw around, he will play the guy who holds on to the ball and has more experience.

Ridley may have ruined his chance to earn more touches this year in the postseason.
 
If Tebow was given the Ravens he'd be in the AFC game.

End of discussion.
 
That's what you guys said last time we met in the playoffs

How many real defenses did you play this year? PIT? How did that game turn out for you?

Miami, KC and Philly say hi.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top