- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 28,168
- Reaction score
- 7,436
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.....If not, maybe he'll be able to start against B-More or Houston. (Crosses fingers)...
He is not as good in coverage as he used to be but he brings so much energy. Great leader and it definitely hurts Denver's D if he isn't playing.
He is the QB of that D. Still looks like he won't play..but i guess he was back at practice today running drills?
Would be a big boost to them if he could play
Where did you see that he was back at practice? All I've seen is that he didn't participate at practice today. Running drills seems like participation to me. I've seen pictures of him jogging in sweats, but he has a neck injury so jogging around really isn't much of an indication one way or the other.
Looked at the broncos forum..tweets from denver reporters it looks like
Looked at the broncos forum..tweets from denver reporters it looks like
I doubt he plays. It is a nagging injury. He tried to go a few weeks ago and lasted about a quarter before he left. The Denver defense hasn't been the same with the absence of Dawkins. He is the "QB" of that defense. While the rookie Carter is getting better, he is a major downgrade for the Broncos.
Agree. They haven't had Dawkins for a while so having him out seems like less of an issue than finding a full-time replacement. From what I can gather they have soured on Rahim Moore (active but didn't play against Steelers) and Brouton is limited by an achilles injury...not a good injury for a guy chasing AHern.
I think Dawkin' watched practice. If he doesn't practice today he will not play.
As good as Dawkins is it is hard to walk in off the street for a long time and be expected to play well. I am glad Chung and Spikes both got snaps against Buffallo, but I expect both will still have some rust in their games particulalry after the bye week. The issue is the injured or rusty player better than the next man up and will the team be better off having the player on the field to get used to the game again ?
Also, I just don't like neck injuries. I do not want to see any player taking chances with that part of his body (and yes I know it is often the player's choice). I don't like seeing any injuries, but injuries to the head and neck are in a different class of bad.
I thought Chung and Spikes looked pretty good considering...I hope they both continue their development from that as they could be huge factors this weekend. The fact we didn't have them was a huge factor in the struggles we had later on in the season against the run.
Agreed on head/neck injuries. I myself picked up a concussion playing and didn't say anything. I went about every day business and managed to hit my head again...I had post concussion syndrome and contracted epilepsy. I can't play any more. I'm 21, can't drink more than a pint or two when I go out because of my medication to stop my seizures...I'm a class A walking example of why the NFL SHOULD be cracking down on what they're trying to crack down on.
| 2 | 558 |
| 0 | 572 |
| 1 | 446 |
| 21 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











