hodgey
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2005
- Messages
- 638
- Reaction score
- 100
I dont think you understand the difference in philosopies to make such assertions.
As a quick break down
1 gap is a penetrating type D predicating on crashing the line of scrimage and trying to disrupt the flow of the play before it can develope. This generally leads to more negative plays but also generally leads to a better success rate of plays called relying on the negative plays to kill the drives.
2 gap is a read and react type of D predicating on lane discipline and creating a wall just behind the line of scrimmage. This generally doesnt create us much negative plays but also creates less of success rate.
IMO its not so much about preventing big plays as it is minimizing the success of each play. Both styles will get beat their share of times. but in theory the team playing 1 gap will likely give up more yards per play not accounting for the negative plays with the negative plays creating a decent average where as the 2 gap may not have as many negative plays but will give up less on a play by play basis.
of course all this predicates on all being equal and that will never happen. I think I a 2 gap can get away with slightly less talent but needs to be smarter.
No disrespect but I really dont need you to tell me what I understand about our scheme versus a scheme like Baltimores or Houstons. My point is either one or two or both of the following statements are true.
1.) The scheme SUCKS and does not fit the players we have
2.) The talent level STINKS and cannot support the scheme.
This does not require rocket science or Bill's approval for posting the obvious.
Supposedly I keep reading here that both Mayo and Wilfork are Elite talents at there positions yet we have a pathetic front 7? We've had a boat load of draft picks, and an owner who obviously will spend the $$$.
Thank god we have the best offense in the league!!!!












