I love posters who go out of their way to cherry-pick statements, without quoting the whole idea that was said.
I claimed that some of us feel he can get a late rd conditional pick, and some of us feel he will just be cut. Besides staying on the team, which very well could be an option, there's only 2 options, cut or trade. As I stated in the part that you didn't quote, some of us feel one way, and some of us feel another way--there isn't any right or wrong.
As far as your 'terrible logic' quote--that is your opinion that it's 'terrible logic,' you don't speak for the entire forum. As we all saw in 2008, when AD was in the running for possible SB MVP (had we won), he can still offer something. We were all devestated in 2008 when he went down with a broken arm, and we all wanted him back to help contribute for a playoff run. If you don't believe me, check the threads about AD in late-2008.
It may be YOUR opinion that he has nothing left to offer, and you may be correct. There is another opinion that is quite popular, that states that he had problems in game 1 vs. BUF, and never had his heart into last season. I don't know how you can be fine one year, but absolutely terrible the next. There is likely a middle-ground on his playing ability, and it's a popular belief that he may excel in a different role, system, or team still.
If you don't agree, fine--I could care less, that's your opinion. You're entitled to whatever you want to think, but don't act like wondering if he still has something left and would be able to contribute is crazy thinking.
There have been other players who have had crappy years, yet went on to have great years on other teams. That's a fact---not 'terrible logic' like you think necessarily. What you're stating is that you already know in your crystal ball that should he be cut, and picked up by the NYJ, that automatically he would suck. How do you know that? Because he had 1 lousy year here?