Curran: Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

[SVN]

Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

 

[chevss454]

Re: Curran:Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

Great read...Curran gets it right and points out very well how Borges' bias slants Borges' irrational thinking.

:rocker:

"[The Patriots] won three Super Bowls, four conference titles and made it to the AFC Championship five times. They didn't go one-and-done in the playoffs until 2009. They finished tied for first place in the AFC East every season from 2001 through 2009. They had one winning streak of 21 games that went from 2003 through those playoffs and into 2004. They had another winning streak of 18 games (2007). They set the record for most consecutive postseason games won (10).

And they won three Super Bowls, four conference titles and made it to the AFC Championship five times.

From 2000 through 2009, the Indianapolis Colts went 124-52 (with one game remaining). They won one Super Bowl, two conference titles and made it to the AFC Championship three times."

 

[FredFromDartmouth]

Re: Curran:Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

Borges is such a Douche. Why do he and Felger and Callahan have to be such awful people?

 

[tanked_as_usual]

Re: Curran:Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

well....he's a homeristic over-stater in his own right......

Patriots' decade of Lombardi-choked excellence

decade? how about a 4-year span

 

[SVN]

Re: Curran:Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

well....he's a homeristic over-stater in his own right......

Patriots' decade of Lombardi-choked excellence

decade? how about a 4-year span

i think the discussion from borges was about the decade. not 4 yrs.

 

[tanked_as_usual]

Re: Curran:Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

i think the discussion from borges was about the decade. not 4 yrs.

well....it is curran's quote

 

[JSn]

Re: Curran:Keeping the facts straight on Pats and Colts

The thing is, we're looking at a different team almost every year, in at least some SIGNIFICANT aspect, and it's always wrapped up to a large degree in luck. This debate might be one of the less important uses of bandwidth today (and that's saying something).