Patspsycho
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 9,922
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He led with his helmet, from seeing the replays, and I believe that's a no no.
He didn't lead with his helmet.
Maybe he could have looked skyward and lead with his chin.
If you're running toward a player, and if you're looking at that player as you're running toward him, you will naturally lead with your facemask.
Unless you believe that you can't make contact with a facemask, then he shouldn't be fined.
That was a good form tackle, he went after the QBs midsection. That being said, he might have hit the QB with the crown on his helmet AFTER making contact with the QB and sliding up his body.
He didn't lead with his helmet.
Maybe he could have looked skyward and lead with his chin.
If you're running toward a player, and if you're looking at that player as you're running toward him, you will naturally lead with your facemask.
Unless you believe that you can't make contact with a facemask, then he shouldn't be fined.
That was a good form tackle, he went after the QBs midsection. That being said, he might have hit the QB with the crown on his helmet AFTER making contact with the QB and sliding up his body.
And you will naturally get a fine. It's not rocket science, you tackle a guy and your helmet hits his, expect a fine.If you're running toward a player, and if you're looking at that player as you're running toward him, you will naturally lead with your facemask.
So if someone did what Chung did to Brady, you'd be ok with it?
It was an obvious penalty.
Aside from not being sure how they figure an amount ($5K, $7.5K, $10K?), I see nothing wrong with the fine. You may initiate a helmet-to-helmet hit, and last I checked the facemask is part of the helmet.
What I don't understand is most hits to the QB draw $5000 fine. Why did this one draw a bigger one. There just seems to be no consistency.
This must be a new definition of "proven" I haven't heard of. Certainly wasn't proven to my satisfaction, but who the hell am I? Then again, it apparantly wasn't proven to the NFL's satisfaction either, hence the fine.umm, i think its been proven already that chungs helmet did NOT touch ANY part of henne's helmet OR facemask
And you will naturally get a fine. It's not rocket science, you tackle a guy and your helmet hits his, expect a fine.
This must be a new definition of "proven" I haven't heard of. Certainly wasn't proven to my satisfaction, but who the hell am I? Then again, it apparantly wasn't proven to the NFL's satisfaction either, hence the fine.
From my perspective watching the game on TV, it looked like either Chung's helmet or facemask hit Henne's facemast, not his chest.Huh? He hit him facemask to chest.
A facemask is part of the helmet and there's nothing wrong with leading with your facemask unless your facemask whacks the opposing QBs facemask (which it didn't in this case). I'd like to see a player make a tackle without leading with his facemask. What would that look like? Would he be looking straight up into the air? Leading with his chin?
| 12 | 2K |
| 59 | 6K |
| 12 | 2K |
| 39 | 4K |
| 7 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











