DisgruntledTunaFan
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 21
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What a doofus Gonzales is. He finally gets a great GM and a decent coach, and a good QB, and he jumps ship. He better hope the Falcons weren't a one-year wonder.Per Michael Smith on ESPN
Great move by the Falcons. Fantastic move. Depending on what they do in this draft, don't be surprised to see this team in the Super Bowl.
They need some LB, DT and CB.. They are REAL thin at those positions.. And remember their schedule is a lot tougher this year (facing the AFC East).. And 4 of their games next year are against teams that are coming off a bye week..
Now the 'why didn't the Pats trade for Gonzalez' comments will start in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
At first glance it's a good move for both teams, a win-win in my opinion. Chiefs get are now back in the second round, which they really needed to do. Better to get something of value for Gonzalez that may help the team for several years. Falcons give their offense another weapon to go with Roddy White and Michael Turner; in the short term Gonzalez should be more productive than a 2nd round draft pick would be.
Now the 'why didn't the Pats trade for Gonzalez' comments will start in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
At first glance it's a good move for both teams, a win-win in my opinion. Chiefs get are now back in the second round, which they really needed to do. Better to get something of value for Gonzalez that may help the team for several years. Falcons give their offense another weapon to go with Roddy White and Michael Turner; in the short term Gonzalez should be more productive than a 2nd round draft pick would be.
Now the 'why didn't the Pats trade for Gonzalez' comments will start in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
If anyone is serious enough to ask that question, the board admins need to drag that member out to the back and shoot him..
Yes, because adding another top shelf weapon would be a bad idea....
Yes, because adding another top shelf weapon would be a bad idea....
Yes, because adding another top shelf weapon would be a bad idea....
Now the 'why didn't the Pats trade for Gonzalez' comments will start in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
If anyone is serious enough to ask that question, the board admins need to drag that member out to the back and shoot him..
If that's the case, maybe BB should forget about defense entirely and just draft WRs, RBs, and TEs. . . .
Well, I just figured it was inevitable based on past experience:
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...4446-patriots-should-trade-tony-gonzalez.html
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/167710-tony-gonzalez-next-season.html
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...10/167041-if-trade-happens-happens-today.html
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...-so-tony-gonzalez-wants-traded-contender.html
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...1590-could-you-see-tony-gonzalez-patriot.html
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...d/10/132933-te-gonzalez-could-we-use-him.html
hehehehe.. I was kidding.. you and I are on the same wave lenght.. But even as we mock the question of the Pats Adding Gonzo, we have people questioning "YEA ADDING ANOTHER WEAPON LIKE THAT IS BAD".. Um.. Yes it is when you'r giving up a 2nd rounder for a 34 year old TE.. A position we hardly throw to..
Short sightedness IMHO
The Patriots have 11 draft picks this season. The team would be incredibly lucky if even one of them has Tony Gonzalez-like production this season or next. Moving one of 3 second round picks this year would have been a great move by the Patriots in terms of value/risk, nevermind moving a 2nd from next year.
| 35 | 2K |
| 79 | 3K |
| 21 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











