- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 55,511
- Reaction score
- 26,537
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.whatever ... many ways to skin a cat as they say ... not sure why anyone would lose sleep over Welker.
whatever ... many ways to skin a cat as they say ... not sure why anyone would lose sleep over Welker.
:confused2:
Surprisingly, some people actually watch football and understand how good he is.
amendola could get a 100 receptions in this offense and is much cheaper. plus edelman can step into welker's role and get 70-80 catches. and tavon austin is an option but he's likely going to be gone by the 29th pick.
whatever ... many ways to skin a cat as they say ... not sure why anyone would lose sleep over Welker.
Brady makes him good. Not the other way around.
:confused2:
Surprisingly, some people actually watch football and understand how good he is.
Would it surprise you to find out that Wes Welker has more career receptions than NFL Hall of Famers Marshall Faulk, Michael Irvin, James Lofton, Charlie Joiner? Welker has more career receptions than Larry Fitzgerald.
When all is said and done, you're looking at a Hall of Fame receiver.
:confused2:
Surprisingly, some people actually watch football and understand how good he is.
Nobody spews more foolishness than you. 111 catches because Tom Brady was the QB.Given that he rang up 111 catches in 2008, you're talking nonsense, again.
Given that he rang up 111 catches in 2008, you're talking nonsense, again.
Nobody spews more foolishness than you. 111 catches because Tom Brady was the QB.
You make my point! Fool.
Nobody spews more foolishness than you. 111 catches because Tom Brady was the QB.
You make my point! Fool.
surprisingly I could go back and show you all your old posts where you thought you had a clue ... and you didn't.
You're the Glenn Ordway of the forum ... your tune changes to fit the current team after you see which direction Belichick chooses to go.
won 3 super bowls without Welker ... we can win another with him and we can win another without him. I remember when you were defending meriweather and bashing Samuel.
Assuming Welker get signed to another team, there is NO guarantee that Amendola will sign with Patriots.
So, if Patriots lose Welker and cannot sign Amendola, Patriots will be in a pickle....
Not necessarily. Edelman could provide 70% of what welker did. The offense may take a hit but if they can use the savings in good defensive players they would be better off. Problem is everyone is acting like welker is the number 1 priority, but vollmer and talib are more important imo.
Would it surprise you to find out that Wes Welker has more career receptions than NFL Hall of Famers Marshall Faulk, Michael Irvin, James Lofton, Charlie Joiner? Welker has more career receptions than Larry Fitzgerald.
When all is said and done, you're looking at a Hall of Fame receiver.
Julian Edelman's career high in receiving yards is 359...in 2009
So you expect us to believe he can be relied upon to essentially triple that total, despite his inability to be consistent or stay healthy up to this point?
What could possibly go wrong??