I listened to the Portnoy-Volin segment and it was basically the two of them stating and re-stating their positions without making a compelling argument for the other guy to change his mind.
I posted earlier that I wish Portnoy would do a better job presenting his arguments or preparing for these discussions. With that in mind, I think he came off better than Volin because, as Ben reminded us several times, Volin's a professional journalist. He couldn't come up with a better argument than Portnoy or deliver any zingers to counteract the ones sent his way. If you're one of the hosts of the show and you're losing an argument to a guest (Portnoy's not a random fan calling in, but he's closer to that level than a coach, player, or media member), that's not a good sign.
One good point that I thought Portnoy made was, when Volin claimed he was a homer, he said he was and he's been right about all the small and large controversies about the team. The contrarians, like Volin, have been wrong. His point was, what's worse, to be a homer and correctly see how things will play out or to take the doom and gloom angle and always be wrong?
What I thought was interesting was, after they moved off the Guerrero talk, they spent a few minutes talking about deflategate. Volin was eager to offer his opinion that he thought the NFL would win their appeal. To respond to Portnoy's claim that he's always been on the NFL's side on this Volin pointed out that he asked Goodell some tough questions and he and other Globe staff have tried to get answers from the league on their false and contradictory statements. It was near the end of the segment, but this was a missed opportunity for Portnoy to press him on why Volin continues to believe the league if they won't respond to his inquiries. They're able to make assumptions about Guerrero and decide that any "gray area" must be wrong, but they just let the NFL slide for more suspicious behavior. At least Portnoy could have asked Volin why his paper completely ignored the Blecker brief.