Welcome to PatsFans.com

Rumor: Seymour Trade Not A Done Deal?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by thewaylifeshouldbe, Sep 7, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Since it's Seymour all day, here is another "rumor".

    Per Patriots Insider

  2. JD10367

    JD10367 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Well, if the other rumors are credible (i.e. Seymour is pissed and doesn't want to go to Oakland, Seymour is the guy Hobbs was referring to, etc.,.), it seems like both the Pats and Seymour have quickly burnt their bridges and this is irrepairable. So Seymour's going somewhere, I'd think.
  3. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    This would make for an interesting situation if true. PI is touting this as there being a problem with the trade, not the issue of Seymour maybe not reporting.
  4. convertedpatsfan

    convertedpatsfan PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    3,331
    Likes Received:
    49
    Ratings:
    +128 / 1 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I sure hope it goes through. Since Matt Millen got fired, we're not going to get a 1st rounder out of anyone else but Al Davis.
  5. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,516
    Likes Received:
    172
    Ratings:
    +396 / 10 / -11

    #24 Jersey

    They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.
  6. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    There can be no problem with the trade since it goes through the league and both teams have acknowledged it as a done deal. The problem likely results from uncertainty over his reporting. And maybe Oakland is leery of a deal they made for a guy who is demanding consideration for even showing up and that is being panned by the experts as a suckers move born of desperation. The five day letter insures Seymour will show up but Oakland may already be regretting the move if that's what it takes... They may be asking for a change of terms to a conditional pick now contingent on his showing up and suiting up. That was what happened in the Plummer debaucle. Pick went from a 4th to a 7th when he retired. Although in that case I believe it meant Tampa could persue him for return of signing bonus and held his rights should he unretire.
  7. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I know the Patriots org. has confirmed it, but hasn't there yet to be an official statement from the Raiders saying so?

    Probably there has been.....I just haven't heard of it yet.
  8. convertedpatsfan

    convertedpatsfan PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    3,331
    Likes Received:
    49
    Ratings:
    +128 / 1 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Could they really ask for a change of terms even after it's gone through the league and been acknowledged by both teams, as you mentioned earlier?

    I believe in the Plummer deal, they knew there was a strong probability the player wouldn't show up, so it was part of the original deal.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  9. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,630
    Likes Received:
    84
    Ratings:
    +253 / 4 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Maybe he'll get sent to the Jets, and that will wrap the Kerry Rhodes 'surprise' thread up nicely :p
  10. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,869
    Likes Received:
    391
    Ratings:
    +1,144 / 52 / -64

    Disable Jersey

    Unless the Raiders waived the requirement of Seymour passing his physical, this deal is not final. I do not know whether or not this happened. I'm merely pointing something out.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  11. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,516
    Likes Received:
    172
    Ratings:
    +396 / 10 / -11

    #24 Jersey

    But it will be if the Patriots and Raiders both want it because Seymour isn't stupid and his choice is to report or sit out the year with no salary and no accrued year to FA.
  12. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,869
    Likes Received:
    391
    Ratings:
    +1,144 / 52 / -64

    Disable Jersey

    Do you really think that the Raider can afford to play chicken on this, after all that's happened there in recent years?

    I know that Davis is 'different', but I'd think that even he would have to ponder this one.
  13. silenthuntr7

    silenthuntr7 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    As BelichickFan mentioned, the Pats can (and might) send him the five day letter, stating he has 5 days to report to Oakland or else he loses a year of pay and a year of UFA eligibility. Therefore, I doubt Seymour will hold out for any significant length of time.
  14. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    A player has every right to refuse a trade to a particular team. However, it hardly ever happens because they want to get paid. If Seymour really doesn't want to play for the Raiders, he doesn't have to. If he doesn't show up, the Raiders can rescind the trade and Seymour becomes the Pats problem. If Seymour puts his foot down, and I doubt he will, he can request the Pats or Raiders to trade him elsewhere. Remember T.O to the Ravens?

    What if Richard Seymour doesn't show in Oakland? | ProFootballTalk.com

    *Update* Pats could send Seymour the dreaded 5 day letter?
    I highly doubt this happens because like the Plummer situation, nobody wins. If Seymour continues to put his foot down, the Pats would be wise to trade him elsewhere. I have a feeling this trade is going to get get rescinded or the Raiders deal him elsewhere ala Terrell Owens to Ravens to Eagles.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ould-eventually-get-five-day-letter/#comments
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  15. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,516
    Likes Received:
    172
    Ratings:
    +396 / 10 / -11

    #24 Jersey

    I'm good with it either way, the KC 2010 #2 is appealing as it would likely be a top half of the round pick and a lot of juniors will likely come out with the possible upcoming rookie salary scale.
  16. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    PI isn't reporting this from the sitting out angle, they are reporting a problem with the trade itself.

    Matter of fact they are updating the story to say that him heading to KC is getting more steam by the hour.
  17. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    I certainly hope not, because if so, this will be the first time I consider Belichick to have screwed up royally.

    Seymour for 1 year is worth more to the Patriots than a second round draft choice.
  18. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    Now that I think about it, the Seymour to KC story might be there to give Al Davis a scare.
  19. Bring Back Antowain!

    Bring Back Antowain! Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    This sounds like total BS. They're just trying to create something out of nothing from the Lombardi (I think it was him) story about Seymour's friend.

    The Patriots and Raiders both announced the trade. It's official. The only thing that could axe it would be Seymour not reporting, but he probably will.
  20. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I mentioned it earlier, but when/where did the Raiders announce the trade?

    I assumed they had, but I can't find a release on it other than Cable discussing him being a good addition.

    Edit: Nevermind, their website shows him on the roster.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>