Welcome to PatsFans.com

Rotoworld: Seymour wants new deal from Raiders (Report)

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Disco Volante, Sep 7, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Disco Volante

    Disco Volante Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Lack of long-term deal likely holding up Seymour trade

  2. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  3. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,975
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +28 / 1 / -0

    My Jersey:

  4. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,254
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +11 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    #12 Jersey
    Doesn't this make sense for Oakland anyways? It's not like they traded a first for 1 year of Seymour, so you kinda had to assume that they had an extension in mind too. They don't want him to hit the FA market either...
  5. Disco Volante

    Disco Volante Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Would make sense to me.
  6. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    I'm pretty sure if they can't get an agreement with Seymour, the trade is off. It's a good move on his part because he wants to secure his future for him and his family. I'm sure he doesn't want to move across the country for a year and than move again.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  7. Reckedtrek

    Reckedtrek Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    It would make perfect sense for a team to want to sign him for at least 3 or 4 years. But then again, perfect sense and the Raiders rarely mix.
  8. WhiskeyBreath

    WhiskeyBreath Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,550
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    He's smart. He knows that organization has given out big money to far lesser players than he is.
  9. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,424
    Likes Received:
    61
    Ratings:
    +82 / 1 / -0

    My Jersey:

    #24 Jersey
    ...and this is what we would have been dealing with in a year. Seymour's trade will hurt us in the short term, but at least we got an outstanding amount of value for him.
  10. billdog3484

    billdog3484 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    the raiders will give him the money..they have to
  11. Reckedtrek

    Reckedtrek Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Absolutely, 100 percent correct!
  12. Patsrock

    Patsrock Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    I believe the only way it is off, is he if doesn't show up.
  13. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Hell, if I was Seymour I would be looking for big dough to play for Oakland. With an extra mil or two a year just for living in the bay area.
  14. wahwho

    wahwho Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Not only that, but a year in Oakland won't exactly help as much as a year in New England if he did end up hitting free agency next year...you get big contracts joining the Raiders, not leaving them.
  15. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,608
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Unsurprising if true. And he has every right to do it.

    I just hope the Pats don't back off the trade value received in order to facilitate a deal. I'm hopeful that they won't.
  16. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,254
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +11 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    #12 Jersey
    or if he fails his physical (which he won't).
  17. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,608
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    On the other hand, holding up the Raiders for a long-term contract is very much a "Be careful what you wish for ..." kind of proposition.
  18. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    If what we are hearing is true, Seymour wants a new deal. And if Seymour doesn't get what he wants, he won't report and the trade will void. I don't see the Pats giving him the "5 day to report" letter because he than becomes property of the Pats and he would sit out the entire year assuming he doesn't report in 5 days. One thing is for certain, he won't be a Patriot in 2009. Wouldn't surprise me if this gets ugly.
  19. Gwedd

    Gwedd PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,896
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    No Mood
    Nope, IIRC, once the trade is signed and passes muster with the NFL, if the player doesn't show up it's the other team's problem and not New England's, unless failure to report is written as an invalidating clause. Also, IIRC, the only way that failing a physical invalidates the trade is if such a requirement is written into the contract. If Oakland didn't have that written in, it's their own darned fault.
  20. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,235
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +33 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Depends on how it's written. It may be that the Pats transferred all rights to Oakland, in which case it is now officially Oakland's problem, or it's possible that they haven't, in which case it might still be New England's problem.
  21. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    I'm pretty sure that is in every contract to cover team's a****. But then again, it's the Raiders.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  22. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,975
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +28 / 1 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Yes, it is possible that the one of the oldest and experienced (and slightly touched) owners has had a bunch of incompetent lawyers writing contracts for the many, many years that Davis has owned the team. Much more likely is that standard contracts have include a requirement for physicals for many years.

    QUOTE=Gwedd;1490995]Nope, IIRC, once the trade is signed and passes muster with the NFL, if the player doesn't show up it's the other team's problem and not New England's, unless failure to report is written as an invalidating clause. Also, IIRC, the only way that failing a physical invalidates the trade is if such a requirement is written into the contract. If Oakland didn't have that written in, it's their own darned fault.[/QUOTE]
  23. Gwedd

    Gwedd PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,896
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    No Mood
    [/QUOTE]

    Oh, I concur. It's just that we are, after all, discussing the Raiders here.... :cool:
  24. thewaylifeshouldbe

    thewaylifeshouldbe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Rodney spoke to him and weighed in-

    PFT
  25. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,254
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +11 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    #12 Jersey
    If Harrison says that it's about him being a warrior who can't stand losing. If Seymour says that it's further evidence that he's a lazy bum who's all about the money and wants to go back to playing 6 games a year as soon as possible.
  26. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,226
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Nothing against what you said HBWU but i always get a kick out hearing that a player whos made more money than this entire board will ever earn in a life time has to "secure his future". I know its all relative but just the same it always makes me laugh.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  27. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Yeah, they must be awfully hungry after Seymour only making less than ten million a year. He should quit the lousy stinking NFL and take a job at the mall. Security guard or something. And Dunkin Donuts is looking for people in Lawrence.
  28. SVN

    SVN Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    22,513
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    eugene parker strikes again !
  29. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,254
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +11 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    #12 Jersey
    If you were in a position to make sure that your children could live comfortably for probably the duration of your lives, you wouldn't take it?

    People forget that these guys' earning potential evaporates around when they hit 35-40. Don't get why anyone blames them for making as much money as possible before then- the future is an uncertain place, bad investments happen, etc. etc.- but the more money you wake, the more you can secure your entire family's long term future. I don't blame any athlete that chooses to maximize his earning potential during his (relatively) short career.
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2009
  30. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My Jersey:

    Not to mention that there was an article recently at NFP talking about how over half of retired football players are broke.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page