tanked_as_usual
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,981
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'd look at an OL if I were KC too, Cassel's pocket presence got better but he's still skittish back there IMO and while the Chiefs have decent weapons, without Moss and Welker he will need solid protection back there. Jason Smith (or Monroe) to go with Albert from last year would help him a lot.- Though Aaron Curry to KC is the popular choice, KC may well go OL at #3.
I know Lombardi said that, but Al Davis and "thought process" is something of an oxymoron. Mayock thinks Al Davis could well take a WR. Who knows what Crazy Al will do.
regarding seymour, wilfork, and mankins......the pats are 67M under the cap.........if they want em, they will resign them..........they are in great shape cap-wise
regarding seymour, wilfork, and mankins......the pats are 67M under the cap.........if they want em, they will resign them..........they are in great shape cap-wise
The cap number is irrelevant, since there will be no cap under which to fit them. If Bob Kraft wants to spend the cash it will take, they will resign them. And they probably should, since, assuming they make the playoffs, there will be restrictions in signing outside FAs.
I don't know.........the phrase 'pulsating uncertainty' bothers me
- The presence of 2 "Belichick disciples" drafting in the top 5 is clouding the pre-draft assessment of what will happen, since both Mangini and Pioli are keeping things close-lipped.
- Mangini is said the be very intrigued with Brian Orapko at #5.
- All 3 1st round QBs are likely to go top 15, with a trade up for Josh Freeman quite possible.
We've acquired lots and lots of players so far this year. Which have been "outside free agents" as defined by the CBA? I think much too much is made of the inability to sign outside free agents.
Except for the fact that they only have half a roster (~26) signed for 2010.
We've acquired lots and lots of players so far this year. Which have been "outside free agents" as defined by the CBA? I think much too much is made of the inability to sign outside free agents.
If your "pulsating uncertainty" last for more than 4 hours, you need to contact your doctor.
I'm talking about next season in an uncapped year. The final four teams will not be able to sign an outside FA (not a re-signing) until it loses an equivalent one off its roster. There are financial implications as to the other teams that finish 5-8...something like a max contract you can sign a FA to.
This offseason is business as usual. Next year at this time it will be very, very different. I kind of look forward to see the strategy BB unveils.
I'll try again. Please name two free agents that we signed this year that we would not be able to sign next year under the 2010 rules. We will NOT limited in our ability to re-sign our own or in the ability to re-sign our own nor in our ability to cut players from other teams.
The biggest effect will NOT be the inability to sign the free agents of other teams. The biggest effect will be the RFA status of Mankins, Kaczur, Gostkowski and Hobbs. With other teams required to send us a 1st and a 3rd, and us still ahving the ability to match, we should be able to keep the players or use the 1st and 3rd compensation to draft a reasonable replacement.