- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,526
- Reaction score
- 24,117
Man, you really hate it when I beat you to the punch, don't you? Try thinking back to prior transactions like Plummer and Owens. Until Seymour actually steps foot in Oaklands' facility, he's still the Pats problem. Players usually accept the trades because they want to get paid. Plummer decided to retire so the Bucs and Broncos worked out something else. Owens flat out refused to play for the Ravens so they were forced to trade him elsewhere and the 9ers received less compensation for him. If Seymour continues to put his foot down, the trade will either be rescinded or the Pats will get less than a 1st round pick for him.
Actually, the Plummer and Owens situations were different. But, you keep thinking otherwise.
Seymour's rights were traded to Oakland. They now hold his rights. If he doesn't go, then he doesn't play and he forfeits his salary and still owes them a year...
As for Plummer, TB still owned his rights after the deal. And Plummer stayed retired.
Much of the Problem with Owens was his understanding that he was a free agent..
Terrell Owens - Free Agent, Baltimore Raven or Philadelphia Eagle?
The situation with Owens was significantly more complex than just a simple "Owens refused to go to the Ravens."