Reading some of the threads about playcalling and gameplans got me thinking. Which offense /teams do you really prefer,ignoring the minor fact that they won SBs the pre 2007 offense -unpredictable every week.use every resource to win even if the player never played much again for the rest of the season e.g dedric ward vs indy, mike cloud vs tenn.always win those games which we have no shot at like playing the rams in stlouis with troy brown in the secondary. -bad offensive game from brady -no problem - we win 9-6 against cleveland. -win 14 games with record # of players on injury report the post 2007 offense -high powered , very scary ,quick strike offense -more 3WR offense ,fast paced ,high scoring -over reliant on brady to be great mostof the time -not much power running game- 4th and1 and 3rd and2's are toss ups. i know this is knee jerk but was wondering what everyone thinks.i give bb a lot of credit for reinventing the offense over the yrs. We have a habit of bashing who we have so iam as guilty as anyone .We complained about weiss ,mcdaniels and o'brien now but this is something i was curious what people feel about the two versions of the offense we have had. my take - we have become over reliant on brady to be great if not perfect.like the colts of the yr past. thoughts ?