No he wasn't. Not even close. He wasn't even the best receiver THAT YEAR!!! Keyshawn went first overall. At the spot he was selected, everybody thought he was a reach. Glenn had only started for 1 season at Ohio State, was coming out early, and had been a walk-on at Ohio State. Harrison was rated above Glenn.
No, nobody thought he was a reach. He was projected as the second or third best player in the draft. He dropped to the Patriots. He was better than Keyshawn in college, and I'm not the only one who thought so, since Glenn was voted better than Keyshawn. Keyshawn had size over him, that's it. Glenn was incredible at Ohio State. Here, refresh your memory:
YouTube - Terry Glenn Ohio State Highlights
OK, so Grier was bad, Parcells was bad, Carroll was bad...but the Pats went to the Super Bowl and average 10 wins a year from 1996 to 1998. Yeah, that makes sense to me.
You like to confuse things don't you? What doesn't make sense is that you can't get things straight. The very post above yours says, "Parcells was a great coach, especially with Belichick." It's not my fault that your brain is addled because you're confusing things. The Patriots went to the Super Bowl in 1996 because of Parcells and Belichick, not because of Parcells' great drafts (his early drafts sucked, his 1995 draft was great, Grier's 1996 draft was great) and that plus the coaching sent them to the Super Bowl. Then Grier came and had sucky drafts, then Carroll came and he was a sucky coach. What more do you need to know?
I don't get your point...Obviously, by your own opinion, Carroll had a terrible roster to work with, provided by Parcells and Grier. But still, he managed to get that team always above 500. Not bad. Statistics wise, Carroll's 1997 Pats did as good as Parcells in 1996 and Carroll's 1999 team was way better than 2000 Belichick Pats. So what now ? He didn't have any power over personnel decision, do you blame him for that ?