Welcome to PatsFans.com

One On One on The Wide Receivers

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by mgteich, Jan 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,585
    Likes Received:
    106
    Ratings:
    +270 / 17 / -2

    In the nfl, teams look for their receivers to be defended one on one. This is a situation where teams have a high percentage chance for a big play. This happens even with average wide receivers.

    When Moss was here, Revis needed safety help against Moss most of the time. Cromartie need safety help also.

    In this game, the corners didn't need help (or not very much). So, when they were in a nickel back situations, they had 3 defensive backs ton defend the middle instead of 1 or 2.

    BOTTOM LINE
    Other teams cannot be allowed to be able to consistently cover our wide receivers one on one. We need better receivers or someone else developing schemes and calling plays. Or both. Tate is not the answer; perhaps Price is. But both wideouts should command a double team.
  2. JFK

    JFK Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Calvin Johnson. I'll trade whatever for him. He can do it all.
  3. patriotscpfc

    patriotscpfc Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    The Jets rushed 4 for most of the game. We kept a TE or RB to block as well.

    That makes 4 receivers vs 7 DB's/LB's.

    With the time Tom had to throw early on, we had no chance.

    We got beat by a better defense than what played a few weeks back.

    Simple.
  4. JoeShmoe

    JoeShmoe Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    The coaching staff/everyone knew that was how were they going to play after it worked against the colts

    Surely you draw up some plays to counter that sort of coverage, slants, quick outs, bootlegs, the odd deep ball etc
  5. FoxboroFlyer

    FoxboroFlyer Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    The guys on the pregame were right if the refs called a tight game it would favor us, if not the advantage goes to the jets. Their DB's were man handling our WR's and TE's all game. There were plenty of plays that could and probably should have been flagged for at the very least holding.
  6. stinkypete

    stinkypete Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +31 / 0 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    Not buying it, Super Bowls were won with less receiving talent than the 2010 team had. It's gotta go back to the D. The Patriots haven't had a dominant defense since 2004, it's time to draft some guys to rebuild the front 7.
  7. alvinnf

    alvinnf Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,300
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +2 / 1 / -0

    There are plenty of ways to get guys open, through formation and motion. If NY wanted to stack the middle of the field and press on the outside. We could have used bunch sets and motion to create open space. Our big TE's are good enough in space to be put on the outside as well. Which at bare minimum would take a body away from the middle and you would be asking a smaller player like a cb to do the rerouting before passing him off. What it comes down to is a poor coaching job by the staff and the qb. In game 2 TB always checked into the right play. I dont feel as though he checked or took what they gave him often enough. The result is a loss.
  8. patsinthesnow

    patsinthesnow PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,461
    Likes Received:
    212
    Ratings:
    +322 / 10 / -1

    #87 Jersey

    What's the trade value points #17 and #28 are worth? Just wondering, A.J Green is the best WR prospect since Calvin Johnson.
  9. sligoker

    sligoker Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I agree with you--except Revis didn't need safety help "most of the time" against Moss--pretty much shut him down as he has done before----exxcept for the play he pulled his muscle on.
  10. The_Riddler

    The_Riddler Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Like I've been saying for a while now, Brandon Tate is not the answer, people kept saying all he needs is time, he's just a rookie. I mean if people aren't convinced now that he's nothing more than a #5 WR on any NFL team, then that his homerism at it's finest. He doesn't threaten anyone, on any defense, no one. This draft and off-season, we need a true, big, physical WR to keep safeties honest and a guy that TB can go to over the middle and deep. The blue print game plan was on full display last night against the dink and dunk, simply cheat everyone up and force the Pats to throw a ball deeper than 30 yards down the field.

    In addition with Tate, why is he still returning kicks for this team?
  11. RoughingthePasser

    RoughingthePasser Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    We sure could have used Randy Moss in this game.....let alone Wright, Warren, Bodden, McGowan etc......
  12. DaedalusX

    DaedalusX Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    If there's one good piece of news, it's that Brady and Belichick are going to obsess this entire off-season over what the Jets schemed. They'll draft and trade accordingly. And it won't work again, at least nearly as well.
  13. sieglo

    sieglo Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,243
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Yeah, and it was made worse by the fact that the OC didn't seem to want to call any plays that would defeat this scheme. every ******* down the jets had everyone pressed up against the LOS and brady only went deep once (a pass that should have been complete).

    The mind boggles at how this team allowed this to happen. They knew what was coming from the Jets. And they had a letdown last year against the Ravens. I think Belichick is starting to turn into a playoff headcase.
  14. sieglo

    sieglo Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,243
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Randy Moss disappears in every playoff game. I don't think his loss hurt that much.
  15. The_Riddler

    The_Riddler Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Let's all hope BB moves on from the Brandon Invisible Tate experiment and gets a legimate WR threat in here either through the draft (yes in Round 1 or 2), not round 3 or lower. Or simply in FA. Tate is clearly not the answer.

    Julio Jones might be there for the taking late in round 1.
  16. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    I would never trade our 1st rounders for WRs on other teams--but I would sign Vince Jackson to a big contract.

    Our pass rush is awful.

    We need a OLB and a DE.

    Plain and simple.

    Ninkovich and Banta-Cain should be watching most of the game from the sidelines.
  17. The_Riddler

    The_Riddler Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Hate to beat a dead horse and I know it's all spilled milk now, but every time I watch Clay Matthews I want to pull a BP and "throw up in my mouth". Upstater, what was that trade again that BB made on passing on Clay Matthews for the trade down? I forgot the details.
  18. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    Uh, you don't hate to beat a dead horse, obviously. The fact is, looking back on a draft makes you look foolish. If a majority of Patriots fans hate the Patriots for passing up a player like Matthews because of a draft day screwup, then we have to give back Seymour, McCourty, Ty Law, Mankins, and many others who were all universally panned by Patriots' fans.

    Your draft record simply has to be better than other teams, that's it. It doesn't have to be perfect... and by the way, trading down is what has netted the Patriots last year's draft class and this year's.

    How in the world can you complain?
  19. The_Riddler

    The_Riddler Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I am only bringing it back up in light of what alot of us have been discussing, which is the pass rush and lack thereof. So it does sound like you would rather have the guys we netted in that trade instead of the potential DPOY and the ultimate game changer known has Clay Matthews. All is good, I know you've been trying to justify that trade for a while now and your sticking by your guns on this one that BB in the end made the right move, I was just double-checking.
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2011
  20. TriplecHamp

    TriplecHamp Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,467
    Likes Received:
    36
    Ratings:
    +78 / 1 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    all of this, especially the bolded, IMO neither would start on most teams.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>