resdubwhite
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 4,681
- Reaction score
- 2,420
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Or they had no intention to settle because NFL doesnt gain anything by settling. If the judge throws out the case they can blame the judge and move on in their corrupt ways.I know....
Goody chimes in yesterday and now Nash.
Seems that they've tried to settle and have reached a stalemate- again. So it seems at this point it doesn't make any difference.
It's going to come down to whether the Judge will consider the findings of the Peterson case or not. If not, he will find that Goodell was within his rights under the CBA. Still could go either way. I *hope* that the judge respects the spirit of what the NFL is trying to do here, which is essentially moving the goalposts. But who knows.
Or they had no intention to settle because NFL doesnt gain anything by settling. If the judge throws out the case they can blame the judge and move on in their corrupt ways.
This is why I'm concerned about Kessler not prominently featuring the fact no ball deflation actually took place.
Still, I only read to page 20 of the Minnesota submissions as directed by one of the illustrious posters on this site. But failing to fully read a document is no bar to having an opinion on the entirety of the document, right?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...dys-deflategate-suspension-baseless/31301467/
Just makes my blood boil reading everything dan nash says and frankly is worrisome
I guess for me I'm surprised more that he spoke out saying he won't reduce the suspension, when I thought they weren't really suppose to be saying anything right now.Really, do you really expect an NFL lawyer to tell the truth: "We're screwed. The NFLPA has us over a barrel. We better settle quick on Brady's terms in order to avoid having Berman set a precedent curbing commissioner power" ?
This is why I'm concerned about Kessler not prominently featuring the fact no ball deflation actually took place.
Still, I only read to page 20 of the Minnesota submissions as directed by one of the illustrious posters on this site. But failing to fully read a document is no bar to having an opinion on the entirety of the document, right?
Judge has three choices
1 vacate
2 submit to impartial arbitrator
3 uphold
It looks like the league thinks 3 is a low probability. 2 would be a disaster. Better to tank it and have the court vacate.