SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Jets have no offensive line
They are a better team this year then last, but a tougher schedule so their record should be similar.
The Jets are a legitimate threat.
All the talk of "Mangina" and the "Jest" is pretty juvenile.
The Jets will be 10-6 and back in the playoffs. People who think they will regress or just go away need to take a reality check. They are not a fluke and not a pest that needs to be brushed aside. The Jets are a legitimate threat.
BelichickFan, the Jets only beat one opponent better than .500 last year, but the Patriots only beat two (one of which was the Jets). Interestingly enough, the 49ers beat three.
All the talk of "Mangina" and the "Jest" is pretty juvenile.
The Jets will be 10-6 and back in the playoffs. People who think they will regress or just go away need to take a reality check. They are not a fluke and not a pest that needs to be brushed aside. The Jets are a legitimate threat.
BelichickFan, the Jets only beat one opponent better than .500 last year, but the Patriots only beat two (one of which was the Jets). Interestingly enough, the 49ers beat three.
They are a better team this year then last, but a tougher schedule so their record should be similar.
I dont think anyone on the board (whos a Pats fan) thinks the Jets have a chance to achieve a better record then the Pats this year.
Check your facts before spouting off. The Jets, Packers and Bears all had winning seasons and the Patriots beat all three.
And if the Patriots hadn't beaten them they wouldn't count as quality wins because New England WOULD NOT HAVE BEAT THEM (they would be quality losses). No matter which way you sell it New England only had two quality wins last year, which is better than the Jets but not by a whole lot.What's more, the Titans, Jaguars and Bengals all finished at 8-8 and would have had winning seasons had the Pats not beaten them.
Why don't you try this reality check you speak of. Look at recent surprise teams. Then look at what the surprise teams did the following season. Surprise teams typically regress the following year because everything went right for them, they had a weak schedule, they snuck up on opponents, they had few injuries, etc.
Huh? They've been stocking it with 1st rounders. Mangold is already getting Pro Bowl buzz (though so are a lot of people). I think the Jets have been building in a sensible way, drafting defensive cogs and o-linemen high.
I also think this forum routinely underestimates Pennington (from the great college program that gave us Troy Brown and Randy Moss!).
If the Jets go 9-7 or 10-6, nobody should be surprised.
Ever heard of D'Brickashaw Ferguson? Pete Kendall?
You said the Jets have "no offensive line" and you are wrong. While not spectacular, it is solid and dependable. Pennington will get protection from them.
Actually, the Packers finished 8-8. Everything I said was factually correct. It is you who need to check your facts before spouting off.
And if the Patriots hadn't beaten them they wouldn't count as quality wins because New England WOULD NOT HAVE BEAT THEM (they would be quality losses). No matter which way you sell it New England only had two quality wins last year, which is better than the Jets but not by a whole lot.
Furthermore, you still sound like an eight year old when you combine Mangini's name with the word vagina. Give my regards to recess.