I don't understand this response and it's relationship to my post.
I
Just saw that, it had nothing to do with your post that was caught in there from earlier, my apology.
Sometimes I am posting from my phone and I hit the wrong things .
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don't understand this response and it's relationship to my post.
I would like to know the reasoning behind using a 2nd rounder on Tavon Wilson.
I would actually be more interested in knowing why he passed on LaVonte David. I am guessing it was size but it was a big mistake regardless.
Living down in Tampa I've seen him play a lot and he's an absolute beast. Kid is one of the top 5 lb's in the league.There was a perfectly good reason. Lavonte was drafted by someone else BEFORE he could pick him. Duh!!!
There was a perfectly good reason. Lavonte was drafted by someone else BEFORE he could pick him. Duh!!!
3. Was the report on Ahern, "volatile, questionable friends and 'dont be surprised if he gets arrested for assault"' or was it worse than that?"
Good thing you didnt ask the question at a press-confe
I'm no investigative reporter, but I Google with the best of em and I spent some time on this (hindsight hypocrisy is a pet-peeve of mine). I could not find a single article written by anyone that even hinted at Hernandez being a risk for violence.
Almost every concern raised was about his failed drug tests for marijuana with at most, a small handful of "off the field character issues" thrown in.
Belichick gave Hernandez a one-more screw up and we will release you warning after an alleged domestic violence call to the police. Maybe there was other warning signs to warrant Belichick getting to that point, but I'm guessing they all came much after Hernandez was signed.
The rumor I think best explains everything about Hernandez was that he started using Angel Dust.
Because the NFL IS a not for profit organization.
The TEAMS however are for profit.
You misunderstand the dynamic that the not for profit organization is the league, not the teams that make up the league.
In other words 32 businesses subscribe to one not for profit service to handle affairs among and between them, and to help the 32 units maximize profits.
I would ask at what point did the team change to this bend but don't break D. Letting up yards between the 20's became okay. My second question would be after Willie left the team why were they not drafting pass rushers to take his place. 3rd question would be why were drafting DB's that were small IE Ellis Hobbs when teams in the NFL were drafting big WR's.
However, I also guess if one were trying to find a flaw in that argument, one might contend that allowing the NFL to function as a Not for Profit restricts the development of a free market in which each team would be able to cut a separate deal with Broadcast, Cable and other media outlets. In so doing, it might be argued that the NFL's Not for Profit status effectively allows the owners to collude to make Franchise ownership attractive to small market teams while attracting a truly national audience in virtually every corner of the country
Yes, thanks, I know that. The question I was addressing was more about the desirability of the situation itself. In the last decade, there has been at least one attempt to have that law changed. Some laws might exist to be broken, others to be challenged as times change.There's a 1960s-era federal law that gives the NFL an anti-trust exemption with respect to the broadcasting of NFL games.
3. Do you have the cheerleaders' locker room routinely scanned for internet cameras, etc. to proactively head off the next big Patriots scandal?