SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Really? Hmmm......
Does crowell33 or Patslifer care to explain the F or should we just assume you are Jets fans?
crowell33=bills fan
"That's not the point" refers to your referencing total offensive output.
For the last time, here are may very easy to understand LOGICAL reasons why he earns a B-:
he only threw for 184 yards against the NFL's worst defense that was also injury riddled.
Most of those yards were the result of YACs from medium to short range passes.
He still holds on to the ball and makes questionable reads. His completeion percentage was high, because he was dinking and dunking, but when forced to make a big throw, he looked very shaky, and could have easily been picked off twice (and would have against a better defense).
That earns a starting NFL QB a B- in my book. If we were grading off of expectations for a backup QB, I'd probably give him a B/B+ because he did basically what I expected him to do against a terrible defense which is manage an OK game.
If you really want to look at passer rating and completion percentage in a vacuum without considering any of these factors then you need to work on your logic.
"That's not the point" refers to your referencing total offensive output.
For the last time, here are may very easy to understand LOGICAL reasons why he earns a B-:
he only threw for 184 yards against the NFL's worst defense that was also injury riddled.
Most of those yards were the result of YACs from medium to short range passes.
He still holds on to the ball and makes questionable reads. His completeion percentage was high, because he was dinking and dunking, but when forced to make a big throw, he looked very shaky, and could have easily been picked off twice (and would have against a better defense).
That earns a starting NFL QB a B- in my book. If we were grading off of expectations for a backup QB, I'd probably give him a B/B+ because he did basically what I expected him to do against a terrible defense which is manage an OK game.
If you really want to look at passer rating and completion percentage in a vacuum without considering any of these factors then you need to work on your logic.
You talking to me about logic after your writings on this thread is the height of ironic humor, particularly since I pointed out far more than just passer rating and completion percentage, which you surely must know since your first response to me involved a post where I pointed to other reasons. But you keep changing your argument (or your inability to use the English language is horrible, since there is no way that "that's not the point" would logically be referring to what you now claim it was referring to) and your evaluation basis is ridiculous, so it's really not worth discussing further with you.
I think that it is pretty apparent by actually watching the game that Cassel was in the C to B range. I don't understand this rating based on him being a backup QB. He is the starting QB for the New England Patriots, do you think the Patriots would win games if they told him "its okay, you are just the backup, go ahead and get sacked 6 times a game, we understand"
Also, you certainly are consistent in the mannerthat you attempt to rip people apart by misrepresenting their opinions, misunderstanding their logic and then bully your way to your "my way or the highway style conclusions"
Obviously you are a football god and all that do not agree with your conclusions are worthless, weak and not worth the time to debate.
I think that it is pretty apparent by actually watching the game that Cassel was in the C to B range. I don't understand this rating based on him being a backup QB. He is the starting QB for the New England Patriots, do you think the Patriots would win games if they told him "its okay, you are just the backup, go ahead and get sacked 6 times a game, we understand"
Also, you certainly are consistent in the mannerthat you attempt to rip people apart by misrepresenting their opinions, misunderstanding their logic and then bully your way to your "my way or the highway style conclusions"
Obviously you are a football god and all that do not agree with your conclusions are worthless, weak and not worth the time to debate.
I would disagree with your assessment of Deus but not every one is as sensitive as you apparently are.....
I would disagree with your assessment of Deus but not every one is as sensitive as you apparently are.....
You can add pretty much ANY member in here of over 4,000 posts - They are all members of the 'family of experts' because they have been here the longest and for that reason and reason only,they are always right in everything they say or you are an idiot