- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.As time passes, the one thing I lament is the poor PR job that this team has done on these types of issues.. they just take what these twitter loving jackazzes put out there.
The Pats should have refuted Spygate and refuted this crap.. as much as I respect BB, this is one thing that I wish he would change..
My blood boils this morning when i first read all this crap.
If i have one complaint about the pats is the absolute miserable PR job they did by not responding to any of it. They dont care for the national media or what they say and its understandable but pats fans have to keep hearing this forever. Its the unfortunate truth.
play-by-play:
USATODAY.com - Super Bowl XXXVI play-by-play
1 redzone possession for StL, 1 TD.
All 3rd down stops by NE for the entire game:
3rd and 18 from the SL 49: K.Warner pass to M.Faulk to NE 40 for 11 yards. Punt.
3rd and 3 from the NE 32: K.Warner pass incomplete to R. Proehl. made FG
3rd and 5 from the NE 34: K.Warner pass incomplete to A.Hakim. FG missed.
3rd and 1 from the 50: K.Warner pass incomplete to R.Proehl. Punt
3rd and 17 from the NE 48: K.Warner pass incomplete. Punt
3rd and 5 from the NE 45: K.Warner pass intended for T.Holt INTERCEPTED by O.Smith at NE 37. O.Smith to SL 33 for 30 yards.
3rd and 20 from the NE 49: K.Warner pass incomplete to T.Holt (O.Smith)
summary:
one 3rd down stopped by INT
three stopped, as expected, on 3rd and 17 or more yards
two stopped on 3rd and 5 attempts (a distance that favors the D)
So it would seem that the two 3rd and short incompletions to Proehl were really the Rams only really good 3rd down shots at keeping a drive alive. Making two stops is cheating. OK. Or maybe you can run it on 3rd and 1 from midfield, you pansy.
I love the fans who scream "cover up" and "destroyed the evidence" as if the league couldn't have just said "the Patriots did nothing wrong" and been done with it if they wanted to. Goodell screwed the pooch by burning those tapes because it gave everyone a conspiracy theory. If they had just shown the damn things like the Walsh tapes we wouldn't be talking about this 5 years later.
Goodell screwed the pooch with his idiotic press conference railing against the Patriots as if they'd been drowning puppies instead of filming from the sidelines when the could legally have been filming from inside a properly located and enclosed area.
Had he just noted that the Patriots location was the problem and given an appropriate fine (low pick, small dollars), this issue would have died in a week.
Watch out. The band of homers around here aren't going to like that one. But you're right. This is something that Belichick should have set straight right from the get go.
Goodell screwed the pooch with his idiotic press conference railing against the Patriots as if they'd been drowning puppies instead of filming from the sidelines when the could legally have been filming from inside a properly located and enclosed area.
Had he just noted that the Patriots location was the problem and given an appropriate fine (low pick, small dollars), this issue would have died in a week.
Willie:
"We had checks for every situation, I don't know what he's talking about specifically but we had checks for every formation regardless of what we saw them do on game film."
"If we had extra information that game wouldn't have come down to a field goal"
Wrong.
Belichick couldn't a rat's azz. He's not a normal human. We all know that.
The problem is the OWNER not fighting this out in libel suits. He just takes it.
I hate to say it, but THAT makes me wonder.
Your logic is weak. Having a team people talk about his all well and good. Having a team that people talk about because a simple rules infraction blew up when it shouldn't have is a completely different thing.
In April of 2008, Goodell explained his findings and decision to destroy the tapes he'd confiscated.
"The reason I destroyed the tapes is they were totally consistent with what the team told me," Goodell said during his State of the NFL speech at the NFL Owners Meetings. "It was the appropriate thing to do and I think it sent a message.
"The actual effectiveness of taping and taking of signals from opponents -- it is something done widely in many sports. I think it probably had limited, if any effect, on the outcome of games.
"That doesn't change my perspective on violating rules and the need to be punished."
yeah, because if it had been cleveland people would still be talking.
when you win this many games, it means you leave a lot of unhappy people behind you.
I'll take the wins -- I'm not that thin skinned.
if you actually have any faith that belichick knows wtf he's doing you'd follow his example and heed his advice.
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran
Willie McGinest responds to Marshall Faulk's comments: If Pats had cheated, "it would've been a blowout." McGinest: If Pats had cheated, 'it would have been a blowout' #PatriotsTalk
Go Willie!
And by the way, amazing how this comment from Goodell (in the OP's linked-to story) never gets traction:
Note that the part in bold is from Goodell. Not a Pats fan.