BradyManny
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 11,103
- Reaction score
- 1,520
Maybe next week against Whale's Vagina ... get busy Tom!!!
LOL! Classic reference. :rocker:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Maybe next week against Whale's Vagina ... get busy Tom!!!
just my 2 cents...i think too many people played well today deserving props than to talk about jackson..he couldnt make the catches for whatever reason, other guys dropped catches too..
we won! and iam actually excited that gaffeney played an important role than say caldwell...
we say jackson is not hundred % every week but still seem to want to justify his drops etc...why ? lets wait on the microscope on him till next yr and watch what others are doing.....just my opinion of course
No need to justify the drops. Those two deep bombs were both closely contested balls that would have been tough for anyone to catch, not to mention slightly underthrown. I'll give Jackson credit for beings heads up enough to prevent interceptions at least. Still the downfield shots to Jackson had to be taken to keep the defense honest. So I have no regrets about those play calls.
Maybe next week against Whale's Vagina ... get busy Tom!!!
What's a Whale's Vagina?
My 2 cents: 1) Both balls were underthrown, so nothing was made clear regarding CJ's health, based on those 2 plays.
2) I, too, do not like the deep sideline route. Gaffney doesn't seem to like it, either. Fast players need to be in space, so they can, you know, be fast.
Maybe they run fast players on the sideline to spread the defense? Just a thought, I am not trying to be the offensive co-ordinator.
I imagine lessening the chance of interceptions might be another reason.
Not really NEM ... he wasn't the 1st option on either of those plays. IMO they were sending him deep to clear out some underneath space. It appears he's healthy enough to be a decoy at least. But no way is he running fluid and fast ... Miller wasn't even working hard to stay with him.
It's nice to have him out there. The field was 2 crowded with the 2-receiver set. If he can be a decoy in San diego as well it will help. Whatever he catches is a bonus ... this much is obvious.
Nothing wrong with it every now and then, of course. Variety is the spice of life, after all. It just seems that the sideline pattern is the deep route of choice. Could it be, however, that these past 17 games have all been a setup? Hmmm...
Both balls were underthrown, but why do they have to go right down the sideline every time? Let him make a move on his man, let him go across the middle, then he'll look real fast.
I agree CJ isn't 100% though - he looked fast last week returning punts, but that's still not as fast as he is. Granted, due to his ridicolously long stride, it always looks like he's running slower than his 4.3.
Well he is what he is and what he is right now is a dud. On that no one can disagree. Hopefully next season will be different.
in defense of the chad jackson haters, i never give the guy a second thought. i could care less. my problem is all the idiots on this board constantly posting about him, taking the tiniest accomplishment and using it as proof he's ready to break out. I end up coming off like a hater because i dare point out that the guy has done nothing this year to make us believe he's this stud people want him to be.
why can't you guys just wait till next year?