F0nSY
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
- Messages
- 819
- Reaction score
- 42
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Unless this was polled before the Superbowl loss, I chalk it up to Superbowl malaise.
Out of every quarterback on that list it was only Brady that got his team to the big game.
Because "he" didn't win it, he loses position to the guys that couldn't even get there.
The only logical reason for this is the NFL players are bitter that the Patriots are good. No other reason Brady should be 4 and Gronk behind Graham.
I'd likely lean more towards the 2-3 spot, but all those guys had incredible seasons. After reading this thread you'd think TB was throwing to nothing but JAGs in a hurricane... Do we honestly expect non-Pats fans to come up with over the top rationalizations in order to raise TB above other players that statistically had better seasons?#4 seems pretty reasonable to me considering the seasons the guys ahead of him had. Statistically, Brees and Rodgers had better seasons, so for those who want to make the argument for them it's a pretty easy argument. Calvin Johnson is Randy Moss with Jerry Rice's attitude. He'll go down as one of the greatest players ever.
How sad is it that people are frothing at the mouth that Brady was rated the 4th best player in the NFL? Get some perspective people.
Yeah, I did. See the post above. If Rodgers played all 16 games with a purpose of racking up stats, he could have racked up more bulk stats, and they'd look very similar to Brady's. Brady's 2007 was transcendent. So was Rodgers' 2011. The Pats' 2007 offense was still >> the Packers 2011 offense though.
I'd likely lean more towards the 2-3 spot, but all those guys had incredible seasons. After reading this thread you'd think TB was throwing to nothing but JAGs in a hurricane... Do we honestly expect non-Pats fans to come up with over the top rationalizations in order to raise TB above other players that statistically had better seasons?
If it were me I'd have chosen Johnson in the #1 spot. I think he's, by far, the most dominant player at his position in the league.
As for Brady, Brees and Rodgers, I'd have to flip a coin.
Saying that Brees and Rodgers both had more at their disposal than Brady did isn't exactly the same as saying that Brady had JAGs to work with.
Brees is the overrated one...to me the dome factor more than anything else drove the stats of Brees.
There is one of you in every discussion. Sadly.Hey Tom..you are not as good as you used to be, you are a system QB and your window is closing. Without Gronk and Welker we were Wildcard at best. Your slipping.
The arrow is pointing down....
Not that I'm debating the merit of Rodgers' 2011/2012 (as it was amazing) but it's considerably easier to pass the football in today's NFL than former years. 3 guys over 5,000 yards is a testament to that fact.I mean, Rodgers went 45 TD-6 INTwith a 68.3% comp and a 9.2 yds/att. His TD%, INT%, Y/A were all better than Brady's 2007 (Brady had a 68.9% comp). Rodgers was an absolute beast last year and is only 28 years old. If Rodgers doesn't sit out at the end of the year, he gets at least 3-4 more TDs (Flynn had 6!). Brady played that 16th game despite locking up the 1 seed to get the TD record. Rodgers arguably had a better season than Brady '07, but it's close.
i can't believe some of you are actng like little whiny children. whether TB is 4th or 2nd doesn't matter.
There is one of you in every discussion. Sadly.