Gronkowski123
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 10,384
- Reaction score
- 5,791
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yes, it's called professional "integrity." Got that Roger?That's why Steph is the man! She not even a Patriots fan, but she can see through the BS!
Re-read it and you'll have your answer(s).always nice to read this stuff but we'll never get our first round pick back.
no idea why kraft caved so quickly.
If you look closely I WAS FIRST. Back offBack off, brother. Too late. Line forms behind me...
Rock, paper, scissorsIf you look closely I WAS FIRST. Back off
Rock, paper, scissors, hand grenadeRock, paper, scissors
Rock, paper, scissors, hand grenade
Yes, Hicks, Branch, Siliga, Ayers, Casillas, Freeney, Chris Jones, K. Martin, Blount, and Dion Lewis all worked out terribly.
The tide is turning.
I'll pay you cold, hard cash...name the amount...Hey guys, me and Steph tweeted back and forth a couple times a while back. We are practically best buddies. I could put a good word in.
Most people agree it's crap but the consensus is that it is back punishment for Spygate. See the ridiculous BSPN article from last year.
By most people I mean fans from other teams.
I'll pay you cold, hard cash...name the amount...
The tide is turning.
How about Suh losing repeat offender status after two years and the Patriots having it after eight.
You overlook the fact that one of the main advantages of drafting well is that you get players on cap friendly rookie contracts. (Consider what Malcolm Brown's value would be as a free agent, versus what he cost.) Any team that wants to "free up $$" can simply pass on their pick when they are called. Because you have more money but fewer quality players, it is a bit misleading to suggest (not necessarily intentionally) that the loss of draft picks is somehow advantageous.