- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,109
- Reaction score
- 52,116
Winning Super Bowls and moving the ball better than any other offense in football despite inferior talent just doesn't count for what it used to.
I would think a more appropriate article would be whether or not Brady has surpassed Rodgers, considering Rodgers looked like Ryan Leaf against the same Seattle defense that Brady carved up. But apparently, Luck is the second best QB in football, despite being a turnover machine and playing in an organization that makes every personnel decision to maximize his effectiveness.
At least the comments section provides some living neurons.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...r-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers
The bottom line is, Luck did more with a very average football team than anybody else in the NFL last season.
-Gil Brandt
Yeah Gil, it was such as terrible, horrible, no-good-for-nothing, very bad team that included in Luck's offense TY Hilton, Reggie Wayne, Coby Fleener, and Hakeem Nicks. Way worse than Brady's 2013 team that murdered Luck once again: Julian Edelman, Matthew Mulligan, Aaron Dobson, and Practice Squad Player #3.
Give me Andrew Luck. He's the only quarterback in the league today who has the ability and upside to match Aaron Rodgers' current level of greatness. In fact, if you gave Luck the Packers' coaching staff and cast of playmakers, I'm not sure he wouldn't rival Rodgers' production right now.
-Dan Hanzus
Yes, and I'm sure Brady wouldn't do any better with three all-pro caliber wide receivers and the best offensive line in the NFL. By the way, "current level of greatness" includes falling on your face with the season on the line. The Packers offense was an embarrassment against the Seahawks; they, not the defense or coaching, blew the game.
OK, that said, Brady's brilliant, career-capping moment doesn't make him today's top quarterback. Or even No. 2. Behind Rodgers, I have to go with Andrew Luck. He has all the trappings of a rockstar passer set to rule the league for another 15 years.
-Marc Sessler
Ah, nothing like missing the point of the question by sidestepping who is better and replacing it with "Who's about to be better!!!!!!?" with the pom poms waving. A amazing, once-in-a-generation QB who now has at least 16 INTs in two of his three seasons. How many times have we seen this "genius in the waiting" story before?
I would think a more appropriate article would be whether or not Brady has surpassed Rodgers, considering Rodgers looked like Ryan Leaf against the same Seattle defense that Brady carved up. But apparently, Luck is the second best QB in football, despite being a turnover machine and playing in an organization that makes every personnel decision to maximize his effectiveness.
At least the comments section provides some living neurons.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...r-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers
The bottom line is, Luck did more with a very average football team than anybody else in the NFL last season.
-Gil Brandt
Yeah Gil, it was such as terrible, horrible, no-good-for-nothing, very bad team that included in Luck's offense TY Hilton, Reggie Wayne, Coby Fleener, and Hakeem Nicks. Way worse than Brady's 2013 team that murdered Luck once again: Julian Edelman, Matthew Mulligan, Aaron Dobson, and Practice Squad Player #3.
Give me Andrew Luck. He's the only quarterback in the league today who has the ability and upside to match Aaron Rodgers' current level of greatness. In fact, if you gave Luck the Packers' coaching staff and cast of playmakers, I'm not sure he wouldn't rival Rodgers' production right now.
-Dan Hanzus
Yes, and I'm sure Brady wouldn't do any better with three all-pro caliber wide receivers and the best offensive line in the NFL. By the way, "current level of greatness" includes falling on your face with the season on the line. The Packers offense was an embarrassment against the Seahawks; they, not the defense or coaching, blew the game.
OK, that said, Brady's brilliant, career-capping moment doesn't make him today's top quarterback. Or even No. 2. Behind Rodgers, I have to go with Andrew Luck. He has all the trappings of a rockstar passer set to rule the league for another 15 years.
-Marc Sessler
Ah, nothing like missing the point of the question by sidestepping who is better and replacing it with "Who's about to be better!!!!!!?" with the pom poms waving. A amazing, once-in-a-generation QB who now has at least 16 INTs in two of his three seasons. How many times have we seen this "genius in the waiting" story before?