Peter King on WEEI @ 1:15

[DefenseRules]

Funny how his phone cut out as he was getting beaten hard on this.

How Convenient.

 

[National Sports Advisors]

Props to Dale and Holley for taking their skirts and pumps off and actually call this hack out.

 

[BelichickFan]

Props to Dale and Holley for taking their skirts and pumps off and actually call this hack out.

Yeah but after 5 minutes they should have said "enough of this crap, let's talk about the game".

 

[Pats726]

and then they COULD have asked him about the 15 second blackout and how some teams were doing this..and IF he was offended at that as he was with 'spygate"....and he offered that and an opening FOR that question..and D&H DID NOT ask that..even though I e-mailed them with that Q for PK...To me that is teh perfect question to ask someone who takes a moral position of being offended at 'cheating".."OK PK you are offended..at this..what about this practice? Does that offend you??" Seeing that inconsistency IS important because it exposes him..

 

[reflexblue]

WEEI should end their relationship with this fool. I do not watch listen or read anything featuring his opinions. There are plenty of other options to get a league wide view, such as Carucci, Czarnecki, Whitlock, Banks, etc.

I agree he keeps talking about SB cheating with vidieo tape. But never admits that it (tapeing) was legal when they won those games. He has an obvious agenda going here.He discounts any other coaches or teams that have admited doing the same thing in the past. His only concern is that the Pats did it. Get rid of him, I won't ever listen,or read his collems again. When he was confronted, he stated his case stuttering and stamering all the way through like he knew he was not telling the whole story. umm,ur, aahh

 

[borg]

King has appointed himself..."Moral Conscious of the NFL"... to go along with his other duties as "World coffee critic" , "College field hockey expert" and "Self important WHAT I LIKE and DON'T LIKE diva."

What ever happened to reporting that consisted of facts and not hearsay.

 

[belichickaholic]

Great job by D & H. PK stated that Mike Marts told him face to face that the video taping had no effect on the Rams SB loss to the Pats. Yet PK still beats the drum. Unbeleivable!

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

Great job by D & H. PK stated that Mike Marts told him face to face that the video taping had no effect on the Rams SB loss to the Pats. Yet PK still beats the drum. Unbeleivable!

Never let facts get in the way of a career building story!
So, PK and WEEI don't know how to re-dial a phone???

 

[Deus Irae]

I don't understand why people are giving Dale and Holley props for that interview. This is a 2 minute topic and could have ended all the nonsense.

Q: Is it cheating to steal signs?

A: ______________________


Q: If it's not cheating to steal signals, what exactly is your point with your gripe?

Q: If it is, why should teams be disguising signals when the league should be watching and punishing offenders?

P.K.: Ummm...... Err...... Ummm....


Q: So you are in effect claiming that people should be wondering about the fairness of past Super Bowls because of the location of a video camera that was in plain view?

P.K.: Ummm...... Err...... Ummm....


Well, having gotten that out, let's move on.



How tough would that have been, for crying out loud?

 

[SVN]

i think they missed an important question that this rule of not videotaping came came in the last 2 yrs and if so why the SB's are being questioned.

 

[patsgo]

by everyone discussing this you all fall right in line to Kings trap, your helping him keep this alive, which is exactly what he wants , he playing you all like a fiddle and you are all to stupid to realize it, drop it, f--k king, and lets concentate on the games

 

[reflexblue]

i think they missed an important question that this rule of not videotaping came came in the last 2 yrs and if so why the SB's are being questioned.

Yeah,as I was listening I thought the same thing. Why don't they bring up the point that it was within the rules in all three SB's And let PK um,and ur,and his way out of that corner.

 

[He Ban Me]

LOL!!!! These jokers have "issues". Paranoia will destroya!!!

 

[Deus Irae]

LOL!!!! These jokers have "issues". Paranoia will destroya!!!

I may be missing something in your post, but King was just on WEEI doing an interview and discussion of that is timely, not the ravings of a paranoid mind.

 

[National Sports Advisors]

Yeah,as I was listening I thought the same thing. Why don't they bring up the point that it was within the rules in all three SB's And let PK um,and ur,and his way out of that corner.

Better yet, why not ask him why he claims his problem is the "integrity of the games" but why he also says he would not be carrying on with this if this was the Lions or Bengals. So, in other words, it's not as big a deal if games between 5-11 and 6-10 teams are having rules broken during them, but it is a big deal if the super bowl champs' games are having rules broken. How the hell does that make sense? The guy is a clown.

 

[He Ban Me]

I may be missing something in your post, but King was just on WEEI doing an interview and discussion of that is timely, not the ravings of a paranoid mind.

The hosts feel like Polian could be behind King or Collinsworth or Easterbrook. Somehow, they just "know" Polian is involved. I see where you all get it. From these two jokers.

 

[Deus Irae]

The hosts feel like Polian could be behind King or Collinsworth or Easterbrook. Somehow, they just "know" Polian is involved. I see where you all get it. From these two jokers.

Come on.... do you honestly think Polian is NOT one of the 'sources'?

 

[He Ban Me]

Come on.... do you honestly think Polian is NOT one of the 'sources'?

I rest my case.

if you feel comfy with that, than I might as well say, "c'mon, you honestly think BB hasn't found OTHER ways to cheat?"

 

[naclone]

i think they missed an important question that this rule of not videotaping came came in the last 2 yrs and if so why the SB's are being questioned.

I'm pretty sure this rule has been in the books for a while.

There was a memo about it sent out the last two years to try and get all the teams to comply with the rule, but to say that it wasn't illegal to videotape the sidelines in 2001, isn't correct as I understand it.

It's kind of like the chuck rule. it's always been in the books, the pats pushed the boundaries of the rule, somebody complained, and they "re-emphasized" the rule a couple years back.

 

[SVN]

The hosts feel like Polian could be behind King or Collinsworth or Easterbrook. Somehow, they just "know" Polian is involved. I see where you all get it. From these two jokers.

quite frankly we dont need these radio hosts to tell us about polian. When this story first broke schefter on nfl network said "people around the league" were angry because this cost people jobs, afc championship games, etc.
Iam quite sure it wasnt cowher talking about the championship games. go back and look at polian's history against BB since the giants/bills days. They dont like each other much. Its pretty obvious he is one of the guys pushing this . If you dont want to accept it , its fine - just dont assume we get all our ideas from radio show hosts.