newenglandsports11
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 187
- Reaction score
- 273
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Didn't you see? There's a bunch of improvements this year:he'll figure out some other stadium experience to keep it going
Watch to see the latest and greatest offseason additions to Gillette Stadium. Get an inside look at the brand new Draft Kings Fantasy Sports Zone, the Cross Pavilion, and Optum Field Lounge.
There's one step first.
Put out a ringing, detailed statement of the actual facts -- not just piecemeal, but all the various stuff people make allegations about.
Then say that anybody who contradicts those in a defamatory way is subject to being sued.
There will be plenty of articles making accusations that are not legally defamatory; that's OK. There also will be articles disagreeing with them. After that dust has cleared, then assessments can be made about who needs to be sued, or at least threatened with lawsuits.
Didn't you see? There's a bunch of improvements this year:
Actually, wouldn't removing the exemption make him wealthier?Hell, he might as well go down with the ship. He won't go broke over doing so, having made enough money to last 8 lifetimes. But **** it. Join some of the crusaders in Washington and go after the god damn antitrust exemption. Maybe we can see Goodell and the other 31 collectively **** their pants on live television. But that's wishful thinking. Kraft's more concerned about his wallet that anything else.
I don't think anything from today's OTL report is actionable even if Kraft wanted to sue. If there's going to be anything actionable in all of this, it's the deliberate false leak slander campaign waged by the NFL throughout Deflategate.
The antitrust exemption wouldn't remove the salary cap. It would (negatively for the league) impact the way TV rights are negotiated.Actually, wouldn't removing the exemption make him wealthier?
Imagine a world where there's no salary cap and they have the right to negotiate their own TV rights. That would put more value on Dallas, Boston/New England, Washington, NY x-Buffalo, LA franchises. Perhaps it's time to threaten the majority of owners that cannibalizing our/his team for the sake of parity is bad for business.
that's what I was referring to
what's next?
The antitrust exemption wouldn't remove the salary cap. It would (negatively for the league) impact the way TV rights are negotiated.
This is correct. For general clarification, the antitrust exemption relates to collective negotiation of broadcast rights.
No. Stop it. Filing nuisance lawsuits does nothing and makes people looks stupid.