BritPat
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,593
- Reaction score
- 1,265
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.One of the many reasons I would welcome an additional first next year.
No way that'll be enough. You're talking RGIII money to trade up for Clowney.
No way that'll be enough. You're talking RGIII money to trade up for Clowney.
No way that'll be enough. You're talking RGIII money to trade up for Clowney.
But we could get lucky and have that additional first turn into the #1 pick next year.
But we could get lucky and have that additional first turn into the #1 pick next year.
But we could get lucky and have that additional first turn into the #1 pick next year.
It depends. Our (hypothetical) additional first could be the first overall.
Can you imagine being the Chiefs. Last year Luck, this year nothing, next year Clowney.
Mental isn't it?
Fans will have to come up with a new slogan to rival "suck for Luck".
"Downey for Clowney"?
Pigs. Flying!
And you know BB trades out of that pick. He'd make a bucketload of picks in that trade.
Very tempting to take Clowney anyway. But BB would probably turn that into Stephon Tuitt, Austin Seferian-Jenkins, AJ McCarron, and something for 2015.
Can you imagine being the Chiefs. Last year Luck, this year nothing, next year Clowney.
Very tempting to take Clowney anyway. But BB would probably turn that into Stephon Tuitt, Austin Seferian-Jenkins, AJ McCarron, and something for 2015.
I was thinking Louis Nix, Kyle Van Noy and something for 2015 and 2016*.
The sad thing for KC is that there is probably is someone worth taking #1, but no one knows who he is yet. Gronk went 42, Ware and Watt 11, Pierre-Paul 15, Ngata 12, Revis 14. None would have been a wasted pick taken 1st overall. But the odds are none of the guys projected as a top 5 pick is liky to be that guy.