OK, now we're getting somewhere. So your actual point is that your illogic DOES apply both in the NFL and in college, but we've seen Wilfork play without Seymour and Warren, so we know he is good. So, extending your fine logic, if we had never seen Wilfork without Seymour and Warren, we never would've known he was good? Right? Got it.
No one is saying Brace will be the player Wilfork is. But let's stop acting like he is some street free agent from Holy Cross.
I give up. I don't know if you're being coy or what; if not, might I suggest a remedial English course, because this is simply going right over your head.
But I've been drinking all day, and since you're a Cane, like me, I'll do you a solid. Here's a logic chain for you; please try to keep up.
Wilfork has played at a high level in the NFL.
Brace has not.
Wilfork and Brace have both played next to very, very good defensive lineman. Both can be said to have benefited from their respective situations.
Wilfork has played at a high level even when his fellow DL have been out with injury.
Brace has not. So not only has Wilfork played well without complementary players, he's done so at an NFL level. Brace has not. So deeming Wilfork expendable and Brace as his replacement is premature.