archstanton543
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 6,694
- Reaction score
- 10,598
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I'm not sure which clinic you are viewing this from.
Never thought to look at it clinically before.
The one with the padded walls obviously...
I think we need a proper working definition of "elite." Top 3? Top 5? Top 10?
Sadly, I don't have one.
I do think that Brady could have up to 4 years of "far better whan what you could likely replace him with."
I do think that from the perspective of the New England Patriots, the question of when to replace Brady has less to do with how good Brady is than some people might think.
I do think that Belichick already knows at exactly what point he's going to decide to sit down, have a chat with Brady, and say "Sorry Tom, thank you for all your years of greatness, it's time for the New England Patriots to go in another direction."
I do think that time is probably going to come before Brady wants it to, because Tom Brady is never going to willingly give up his job here. He's going to want to compete for his job as long as the team lets him, because that's just who he is.
I do think that there's a time that will come that Brady thinks he still has something in the tank and the New England Patriots disagree.
I do hold open the possibility that that disagreement will culminate with Brady possibly pulling a Manning playing one or two final seasons in another uniform, although I don't consider that the most likely scenario I do think it's very possible.
I would be willing to fight anyone who said that if this happened it would tarnish the legancy of any of Brady, Belichick, or the Patriots organization.
This is not an organization well known for holding onto players out of sentiment, and if Brady isn't a fit for where the Patriots are as an organization at a certain point, even if he could be an average or better quarterback at the time, they will cut ties. If another team then dangled a large contract in front of him to kickstart their attendance and give his experience to some other young squad? And it wasn't a rival of the Pats? Do you really think he'd turn down the opportunity to play a little more NFL football and prove some people wrong and try to cement his legacy as his own player and not a cog in Bill Belichick's machine? I don't.
I wouldn't blame him one little bit either, and I'm at the point now where even if he was playing for another franchise for those few final seasons, he's earned the right to have me root for him every step of the way as long as he wasn't playing against us.
I think Aaron Rogers stays in GB and plays more than the next 5 years.
He's said he won't play when he "sucks." What Brady means by "sucks" might not be what anyone else means by sucks.
Is playing when you're able to lead your team to a 10--6 or 11--5 record and win the Division or snag a Wild Card, but you're no longer able to be competitive in the three or four games in January that win a Conference or SB Championship part of "sucking?"
For 26 or so QB's in the league today, it most definitely is not; they'd be asking for big new contracts if they could play at that level.
But, for Brady, I think it would probably be part of his definition of "sucking."
I signed up for two years. Why? Because he played the last quarter and a half plus OT at an unworldly level. I don't think he's in this to "make the Playoffs" or set personal records...not that he has that many left to set. He's in it to win Championships and go to Super Bowls.
How long can he keep that up? It's uncharted territory, so we're all just guessing. I'm saying two years, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
You did not include Zero as an option. This past season was not elite, although certain periods within games overcame other periods of abysmal play. Brady has had periods of obvious deteriorating play, in many games. Steady play used to be his claim to fame No more.
They won in spite of them. Even this Super bowl showed declines despite being his ultimate triumph and best. Period four and overtime superb performance, overcame abysmal play in 1st, 2nd, and most of the 3rd quarter.
We can expect the decline to continue that was noticeable this year. (If you care to look and view it clinically).
I'm worried that one unlucky injury might impact these predictions.
Interesting enough, if Brady retires at 43 and walks away playing at a high level, doesnt that mean father time lost? Anything past 40 and retiring at a high level is a victory in my book.Tom Brady is officially in sudden death overtime of his NFL career.
No QB in NFL history has ever started a season at 40 and played elite.
Ever.
(Favre was 39 in week 1 of '09; Moon had a decent year at 40, but not elite).
That said, I voted 3 more, and wouldn't be surprised if he made it to 45. You can't put anything past this guy.
Tom Brady is officially in sudden death overtime of his NFL career.
No QB in NFL history has ever started a season at 40 and played elite.
Ever.
(Favre was 39 in week 1 of '09; Moon had a decent year at 40, but not elite).
That said, I voted 3 more, and wouldn't be surprised if he made it to 45. You can't put anything past this guy.