TinhWoodhead
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 4,623
- Reaction score
- 4,983
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.That's the main reason why I wonder whether they'll trade him at all/what it would take for them to consider a trade. A 3rd rounder? A 4th rounder?In theory, yes. Browns only owe him $1.1m next year and is a RFA in 2017 so I doubt they cut him.
In theory, yes. Browns only owe him $1.1m next year and is a RFA in 2017 so I doubt they cut him.
They can sit back and see what/who happens.
The first step is reinstatement.
he would! plus a trunk load of uggsBut would Brady give up his #12 jersey to get him?
Yep. An excellent point. If I was GM of CLE that scenario would be a huge factor in the decision.If I'm Cleveland and someone calls to make a trade, I'd take it in a heartbeat, this guy is potentially one incident away from a lifetime ban.
I think the pick/compensation needs to be conditional.Our 2nd rounder for Gordon and a 2nd/3rd day pick next year.
It ultimately comes down to whether the Browns think Gordon manages to stay out of trouble. With his contract situation they need to think whether Gordon's a long-term solution for the franchise. If they have no faith in him or their ability to keep him in track and have no intention to sign him long-term next year, they might deal him if the offer is good enough.Its so intriguing that I ultimately don't think it will happen. If the Browns know he is going to be reinstated then why would they trade him?
I think the pick/compensation needs to be conditional.
5th just to get him. That is gone no matter what.
...an a additional 3rd or 2nd whatever if he lasts the 2016 season.
Just think several teams will go after this guy.