- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,645
- Reaction score
- 16,426
I think that we will keep the "new normal" 8 OL's. We now have 8 OL's active plus one inactive backup. I am a bit nervous with having ALL of backups oin the Practice Squad.
MG's "STARTUNG POINT" FOR CAMP
OT (3): Brown, Reiff, Anderson (with at least one more on the Practice Squad).
Also, Strange or Sow can be an emergency 4th OT if needed during a game. And, yes, one could be good enough to start in 2024. For me, we needn't weaken the IOL in 2023. Our current situation at IOL is a good mix. A veteran starter, a sophomore starter and a rookie Game Day backup. We need to understand that Strange is still learning the NFL game, as Sow will be.
OG: (3) Strange, Onwenu, Sow (If Sow isn't ready, the we have Hines or Mafi available)
C: (2) Andrews, Andrews
OL (1) (inactive backup): Mafi or Hines
==============================
Sure, Russey or Steuber make themselves too valuable to cut, especially if there are injuries.
Sure, McDermott of Cajuste could make themselves too valuable to cut.
MG's "STARTUNG POINT" FOR CAMP
OT (3): Brown, Reiff, Anderson (with at least one more on the Practice Squad).
Also, Strange or Sow can be an emergency 4th OT if needed during a game. And, yes, one could be good enough to start in 2024. For me, we needn't weaken the IOL in 2023. Our current situation at IOL is a good mix. A veteran starter, a sophomore starter and a rookie Game Day backup. We need to understand that Strange is still learning the NFL game, as Sow will be.
OG: (3) Strange, Onwenu, Sow (If Sow isn't ready, the we have Hines or Mafi available)
C: (2) Andrews, Andrews
OL (1) (inactive backup): Mafi or Hines
==============================
Sure, Russey or Steuber make themselves too valuable to cut, especially if there are injuries.
Sure, McDermott of Cajuste could make themselves too valuable to cut.