- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 55,481
- Reaction score
- 26,493
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I like that... I'd also add that style allows for play action as well.. as you bring the safeties up closer to LOS to help with the run.. therefore the TEs have more room to operate.. I'm going to love seeing Gibson catching it out the backfield going for 40..I love the dink and dunk, backed up with a strong running game... methodically moving the chains, creating an atmosphere of impending doom because it is inevitable... nothing better when a back in the flat breaks one wide open and gobbles up huge chunks of yardage...
That 94' niners team was goodPreference is smashmouth football and a punishing defense
With that said i've never seen more enjoyable units to watch than the 1989 and 1994 49ers. Closest thing to art on a football field.
07 Pats were up there but those 9er teams mixed the run and pass better.
If not for disastrous 1st quarter with turnovers by the Cowboys they would of 3 peated. Cowboys fumbled twice and had a pick 6 in the first 3 minutes of the game. It was 21-0 and the final score was 38-28. Michael Irvin had like 200 and 2 tds that game. Good teams cause the turnovers but that was very unlike them.That 94' niners team was good
None of the above.Not intended to do more than simply ask, if you had to pick an offensive identity for the Patriots, and talent wasn't an issue, what style do you prefer. Something more like the Rodgers/Manning style air game? A heavy smashmouth rushing attack with the QB playing second fiddle like we did in 2001? The possession based discipline focused game we played in the early dynasty? Something more fluid like the RPO/Run-and-shoot/triple option that requires a very athletic QB? Or something else?
Simply put, which do you like watching better?