I didn't make that comparison. I said I'd rather have Welker (I would, for what we need. Largent wasn't as spastically elusive as Welker, and that's what we need Wes for. Largent was a great possession receiver, but we don't really need that).
I also said i didn't consider him an all time great when he played (I've been watching football since the early 60's.)
He was a very good, disciplined, reliable possession receiver who was consistent over a long period. There were receivers during his era with less accumulation of statistics I considered great, that defense adjusted for, that made great plays.
I'm making different points than the OP, not agreeing with him.
