- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,513
- Reaction score
- 50,150
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It has nothing to do with him being an RB. Article below explains it, including nuances around the Saints’ pick at number 40. It’s worth a read.He knows that this is likely the only contract he will ever have based on the average career length of a NFL RB. I applaud him for holding out but this is a reminder that the Pats should have never selected a RB that high to begin with IMO.
But May turned to June and Henderson still had not signed. At the time, information emerged not only on Henderson, but on all of the second-round picks. Only two had signed by June 1.
The reason, apparently, was that the top two picks of the 2025 NFL draft second round — Cleveland Browns No. 33 overall pick Carson Schwesinger, a linebacker out of UCLA, and former Iowa State wide receiver Jayden Higgins, taken by the Houston Texans at No. 34 — were signed by their teams to fully guaranteed four-year rookie contracts.
According to former NFL player agent Joel Corry, this was an unprecedented move by the two teams (the Texans did it first, followed by Cleveland the next day). Four full years of guaranteed money had previously been reserved for first-round picks.
Now, nearly another three weeks have gone by and neither Henderson nor any of the other 29 unsigned second-rounders have come to terms.
This is his last shot. The Pats can cut bait on that horrible contract after this season if he doesn't play well.I'm not sold on Rham at all as the answer at RB1 in the backfield.
Have no problem trying to upgrade that part of the team in talent and to help carry the load with Rham.
Good post. I don't think the RBs got devalued due to usefulness on the field. You still need balance and most of the best teams have good running games and typically one of the better backs in the league.I think getting a RB in the first round is a bit too much, especially for a team with lack of talent all around the roster and with bigger needs, but in the 2nd round, I have no problem using a premium pick on a special player, taking that risk knowing its highly unlikely it wont work out. Maybe they were looking for a WR or another prospect that someone took before them, who knows, what I know is that he's probably the best RB out of the first round and although not a huge need, it was still a need, we need talented players in the offense all around and a good RB helps the QB, the OC, the OL, everyone.
It's funny that I'm hearing here and there things about "the return of the running game", "the return of the emphasys in the running game" and things like that, well for me it never went away, when did the running game was a no factor in the game? I don't recall, a good RB is still a difference maker. The value we can discuss when it comes to free agents, draft picks etc, but I don't have a problem using a 2nd round to secure an above average prospect, when you get RBs in the 4th or 5th round it can still work out but it's more of a gray area.
Backs are way down on the teams priority. Can this Oline function in opening holes for the backs. After we see this plug and play the backs as required. I'm really hoping Vrabel makes a powerful running game a Top priority vs the passing game.
Although in fairness, Vrabel never had a QB he could trust to drop back 40 times either.You will almost certainly get your wish. Vrabel’s philosophy is based upon the premise of “ beat the living **** out of your opponent,” and running the ball is 1/2 if that battle. You don’t dish out the hits by passing the ball, in fact your OL is backpedaling and taking the hits all day when you are throwing the ball 40 times. And nothing helps to develop your OL like dishing out the hits, especially when the 4th quarter rolls around.
Although in fairness, Vrabel never had a QB he could trust to drop back 40 times either.
Although in fairness, Vrabel never had a QB he could trust to drop back 40 times either.
I immediately thought “or an OL that could be trusted to keep the QB alive through 40 drop backs.”I agree, but I still think throwing the ball all day makes life impossible for your OL.
I immediately thought “or an OL that could be trusted to keep the QB alive through 40 drop backs.”
You’re missing the point. By running the ball your OL is dishing out the hits instead of taking them. This wears down defenses and makes your offense more effective in the 3rd and 4th quarters. If you want to play physical football you have to run the ball. If you want a physical team you have to be dishing out the hits on both sides of the ball.
People often neglect the disintegrating effect of physical play on both sides of the ball.
Then youve got the Eagles with Barkley, who was a huge contributor in their success. While he did not have a great Super Bowl, the Chiefs had to defend him at all times.Backs are way down on the teams priority.
True. With the production that Barkley and Henry have had they have reset the market for backs. For a few seasons the RB contract had become minimized. These guys take a beating and should be paid correctly. Henderson will sign before camp begins.Running Backs are the main position that gets screwed on the rookie wage scale.
Correct on your assessment. The Chiefs focused so much on Barkley that it affected thier coverages. Harbaugh seems as of he wanted to show everyone that Jackson could win a play off game on his own. Why they wouldn't run at that small buffalo front is a mystery.Then youve got the Eagles with Barkley, who was a huge contributor in their success. While he did not have a great Super Bowl, the Chiefs had to defend him at all times.
The Ravens had Henry. When he had a certain number of carries the Ravens won the game. Vs the Bills in the postseason, Harbawl chose not to ride Henry to the win column. I am convinced that Baltimore would have beat KC for a trip to the Super Bowl.
The Chiefs were crippled because they could not run the ball in the Super Bowl.
| 55 | 3K |
| 166 | 11K |
| 142 | 9K |
| 28 | 3K |
| 231 | 9K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











