- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 16,818
- Reaction score
- 35,180
Rex was the guy who said that, just recently, in regards to how the sports media doesn't give a **** unless things are going bad.
Tabloid sports media is the norm now - their goal is to report on controversy whenever possible. When there is a little bit of controversy they over-report it so it seems like a lot of controversy. Eg, Jaws saying that he thinks Kaepernick could be one of the greatest of all time, ESPN reported and reported what their own guy said so they'd have a story.
Breer's line of questioning with Belichick wasn't about finding out about Gronkowski - in retrospect these guys are smart enough to know Belichick's going to give a non-informative blanket statement by now. No, it was about Breer trying to get Belichick annoyed enough that he'd say something worth reporting on.
In short, a media schmuck trying to make a story about how Belichick gets along with sports media. Similar to the same **** that Borges pulls.
Look at the NY media - guys like Mehta and Cimini write what they write to make the story about themselves. Because if there's one entity in the equation that is interested in making damn sure there's a story for the sports media to report on it's the sports media. It's not megalomania it's just a business model.
And I'm ******* done with it. Breer antagonized Belichick deliberately in the hopes that he'd be able to write some dumb **** today about how Belichick behaved at a press conference.
Tell me how this **** has anything to do with football and why I should give a flying ****?
Tabloid sports media is the norm now - their goal is to report on controversy whenever possible. When there is a little bit of controversy they over-report it so it seems like a lot of controversy. Eg, Jaws saying that he thinks Kaepernick could be one of the greatest of all time, ESPN reported and reported what their own guy said so they'd have a story.
Breer's line of questioning with Belichick wasn't about finding out about Gronkowski - in retrospect these guys are smart enough to know Belichick's going to give a non-informative blanket statement by now. No, it was about Breer trying to get Belichick annoyed enough that he'd say something worth reporting on.
In short, a media schmuck trying to make a story about how Belichick gets along with sports media. Similar to the same **** that Borges pulls.
Look at the NY media - guys like Mehta and Cimini write what they write to make the story about themselves. Because if there's one entity in the equation that is interested in making damn sure there's a story for the sports media to report on it's the sports media. It's not megalomania it's just a business model.
And I'm ******* done with it. Breer antagonized Belichick deliberately in the hopes that he'd be able to write some dumb **** today about how Belichick behaved at a press conference.
Tell me how this **** has anything to do with football and why I should give a flying ****?











