- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
- Messages
- 22,846
- Reaction score
- 42,851
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I see your point, but I respectfully disagree. Derby didn't really play that much at QB, he was a backup at Iowa and Oklahoma before being converted to TE, the only year he really played QB was one year at Coffeyville Community College. Conversely, Edelman was an excellent college QB, a starter for 3 years at Kent State.
However, the primary reason I would expect Edelman over Derby is that Edelman has a deep understanding of the Patriot Offense, a sky-high football IQ, and years of experience in that offense. Derby was on IR last year so his experience with the Patriot offense is very limited. IMHO, it is the same reason why we haven't even considered bringing in an emergency backup QB, because nobody could learn the offense fast enough to run it by Thursday.
Edelman may know the offense, but I don't think he could run it as a QB. He has to set pass protections, read the defense, know where to go with the ball, and make sharp accurate passes. I don't think he'd have a chance of doing those things and I'd worry about Watt breaking him in half. Whether it's him or Derby, the offense is going to have to entirely change and become very simple. I like Derby better because at 6'5" 255, he should be able to hold up better. He also isn't as important to the team if he does get hurt (sorry AJ, but it is what it is). They would have to go to something like a very basic college option run based offense with perhaps a few tricks.
I am actually expecting a couple of special plays with Edelman at QB, regardless of how well Brissett plays.
I hope we don't see any with Derby at QB but that wouldn't be a stunner if he did, and BB might do it just to get it out there and give DCs something to think about.
That would be interesting, maybe you are right.
How about this?
Derby takes the snap and hands off to Edelman for an end around.
Derby chip blocks a defender and then goes out for a pass.
Edelman stops and throws toanother receiverDerby for a big gain, as Derby crushes a defender with a block?
I hope and trust that this is just idle speculation, but suppose Edelman DID have to QB, in a situation where going all run all the time didn't seem likely to win the game. What would happen?
My guesses start:
- He's probably practiced enough to maintain good throwing mechanics. The one pass to Amendola is encouraging in that respect, although his footwork wasn't exactly standard.
- BB and Josh McD probably have well-founded opinions as to what kind of situations Edelman would probably make good decisions in and which he wouldn't. Play-calling would be in line with those.
- There wouldn't be a lot of designed runs. Those aren't in the playbook in general, so the rest of the team hasn't practiced them much. Besides, keeping Edelman healthy would seem important.
- However, if the first down on the ground was there, he'd take it. So the defense would have to respect his rushing ability.
The reporting seems to suggest the backup is indeed Edelman.
I agree completely that the playbook would be very stripped-down.
TSo far as I can tell, Brissett is another Patriots backup QB who's pretty decent on the run (not a racial comment -- Cassell is high on my list, and of course there was the Tebow experiment). This reduces the likely of Edelman getting Wildcat-style snaps if Brissett is healthy.
i wanted to say troy brown, but his only pass was off a lateral from bledsoe in the final game of the 1999 season against the ravens (it was incomplete):Imagine if Edelman lines up at QB... What other player in NFL history has played WR, PR, CB, and QB?
If there is, you would likely have to go back to the 1950's or earlier, when playing multiple positions was more common, i.e. before my time.Imagine if Edelman lines up at QB... What other player in NFL history has played WR, PR, CB, and QB?