Superbowl Winner if not the Pats

[CISGS]

I would want KC. This way Balke can hand the Lombardi to Alex Smith in San Fran.

 

[Brady_to_Moss]

Cards or KC. But I don't think KC has any shot with their O. D yes.

 

[Foxyboro]

Really wouldn't mind Cincinnati winning if not us. That city deserves it

 

[pheenix11]

If not us then I hope either the Cards or Panthers make it in the NFC and thrash the living crap out of Manning (if he makes it).

 

[everlong]

If not the Pats from most to least favorable:

AZ
Houston
Minnesota
KC
Cincinnati
Washington
Seattle
GB
Pittsburg
Carolina
Denver

 

[mosi]

In the immortal words of Rhett Butler: "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"

 

[turkeyneck]

1. Not Manning, just to spite the NYJFL media machine.
2. Not Newton, just to spite the NYJFL media machine.
2. Smallest market team, just to spite the NYJFL media machine.
3. Redskins, just to spite the NYJFL media machine.
4. I'd ok with Minn or AZ.

Edit: I'd also be more than ok with Sea putting another pounding on Denver.

 

[captain stone]

If not the Pats from most to least favorable:

AZ
Houston
Minnesota
KC
Cincinnati
Washington
Seattle
GB
Pittsburg
Carolina
Denver

I would have GB higher in the list and AZ lower, only because the Bidwell family needs to concede that the Chicago Cardinals are not the legitimate 1925 NFL Champions; that title righfully belongs to the Pottsville Maroons.

And I am in complete agreement with your bottom 3.

 

[everlong]

Ya the bottom three is the important part. I'd have GB higher if I didn't think the media would start the Rogers GOAT talk. Steelers fans hated Ariens when he was the OC and the Colts let him go so there's a lot of schaudenfraud with that pick but I also like a lot of their players.