Discussion in 'NFL Football Forum' started by Ice_Ice_Brady, Jan 19, 2020.
The rest of the post about Goodell has legs.
The over/under is 52, so the winning team is going to take it 26.01 to 25.99. It will be really close.
Not really when the core premise of the post has warts all over it. I like @Joker, but that’s the kind of post that a man with thick bifocals makes after he sweeps the apartment for bugs that he thinks the NSA planted to spy on him.
Not touching that one...Joker's my guy. But if he weren't, I'd say that's pretty f'ing funny
@Patstastic did you take that pic in 2005?
still can’t believe he went back to that profile pic lmao
it’s not even with a cell phone which kills me
I think we are kidding ourselves if we say that we’ve never taken a pic like that for a woman and texted it to her.
But never in a million years would I make a selfie like that my profile pic. What a ****in’ noodle.
1. Why would you post that as your avatar?
2. Do they still make digital cameras?
3. Why not just use a phone?
4. Is that picture from before they had smart phones?
5. When did people use digital cameras to take selfies?
6. Before social media and digital messaging, why would you take a selfie with a digital camera, considering no one took selfies back then?
I have so many more questions, but let's start there @Patstastic
These are the Lord’s questions. Hosannah.
Just updated the thread title. The line is now KC 1.5. The handicappers read @KontradictioN 's take on the game.
Since you all dislike my profile picture...I've changed it.
I like the Niners. Running game and D line is solid. They are a fast defense. I think they can keep up witb the Chiefs speed. Jimmy G will have to pass more than the last 2 weeks. When they needed to pass this season he has answered the call. He will be fine. Reid versus Shanahan. I give a slight edge to Shanahan...
I love your profile pic. It’s good to have confidence.
Where did you see it opened at a pickem because I saw 1 to 1.5 pretty much everywhere
No, I didn't infer that. The 9ers/Ravens Super Bowl WAS a fix...from the elevation of a rookie ref with rocks for brains to the 1/2 hour timeout so Ray The Elderly Murderer Lewis could get his wind back to the TRIPLE interference in the EZ on Crabtree at the end. The next day, THE NEXT DAY, Ray Ray was in a seat on ESPN as a league analyst.
The Rothlisberger Super Bowl? F-I-X. Seattle fans are still irate over THAT con job.
The Goon isn't always successful getting his narratives implemented but it doesn't really matter..Article 46 after all. You can believe this league is all rainbows and unicorns if you want. I'm always on the side of Arnold Rothstein when I see a sports stink extravaganza
Joker's a crazy old man who sees things!!!
It is in the link in the first post, and I saw it on pinnacle sports, which is usually my go-to.
As I understand it, a bunch of books put a line of KC -3 after the AFCCG. To me, that was kind of ridiculous because it's going to screw with the actual line since the NFCCG hadn't been played yet Had both teams looked bad, it might have stayed the same or even moved to more than 3, but with the 49ers taking the Packers to the woodshed, everyone nailed the SF +3 line to the point where it was anywhere from KC -1.5 to pick 'em for about 30 minutes until settling on KC -1.5. But setting the line before the NFCCG was even played shows these oddsmakers are like news outlets trying to race to be first instead of getting the line correct. Now happened to them two years in a row where early money flooded in on one team (last year it was New England, this year San Francisco.) Both times it was the second game of the day. Maybe a little hint for next year in looking at how these lines move.
Niners can score with the Chiefs.
Chiefs d is not good enough to win a defensive battle.
I am going with the 49ers.
Separate names with a comma.