Gainzo
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 2,499
- Reaction score
- 82
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Funny, the guy talks more and more about this the more he is hyping his stupid book. I'm sorry, but even if I didn't hate the guy there would be no way I would buy his book.
Besides, he didn't say there was evidence that there was taping. That could just be Walsh's story that he told Specter with no evidence to back it up.
This does raise questions of Specter's and Levy's relationship since Levy is showing Specter communications between them and the NFL. That isn't illegal, but you gotta wonder if Specter is funding Levy either directly or indirectly (through Comcast).
I believe if there was a tape we would have seen it by now. If Walsh had a tape he would have released it right before the Superbowl. With all the media hysteria he could have made a fortune and done even more damage to the Pats. But so far...no tape. Walsh has nothing.
I tell ya, Eagles fans just don't know when to let go.
I think we all know that Specters posturing is all about the Comcast/NFL feud and has nothing to do with the Patriots. He is using the Pats as a pawn for Comcast.
If I was an Eagles fan I would be embarrassed by Specter's behavior. I know some Eagles fans and they put the Super Bowl loss on the shoulders of McNabb.
I think that, for convenience, we should call this Walsh's paradox: If a tape exists, why haven't we seen it yet?
[I take this from Fermi's paradox--if extraterrestrial life exists, why haven't we detected it yet?]
I've seen the letters. Walsh's lawyer let me see them on a promise of confidentiality, and I believe an objective and fair reading of those letters is that the NFL is discouraging Walsh from coming forward.
quote
I've seen the letters. Walsh's lawyer let me see them on a promise of confidentiality, and I believe an objective and fair reading of those letters is that the NFL is discouraging Walsh from coming forward.
unquote
Shouldn't a promise of confidentiality mean Specter should not comment on the letter or characterize it in any way?